User talk:MerlinsMagic

Welcome!

Hello, MerlinsMagic, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! Omarcheeseboro (talk) 13:02, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion of Relationship pleasure scale
A tag has been placed on Relationship pleasure scale, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Omarcheeseboro (talk) 13:02, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Relationship pleasure scale
A tag has been placed on Relationship pleasure scale, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Omarcheeseboro (talk) 13:24, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

December 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Omarcheeseboro (talk) 13:25, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

October 2009
If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 16:46, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 19:02, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 PAIRS Foundation, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Bjelleklang -  talk 17:32, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

License tagging for File:CDR logo.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:CDR logo.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:05, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Feminist movement
Hi, I have reverted the addition you made to this article as it appears to be a copyright violation. You claim to have permission but we need that to be confirmed before it can be used. Please see WP:donating copyrighted material for details of what is required. noq (talk) 18:42, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

OTRS pendingMerlinsMagic (talk) 18:52, 27 November 2012 (UTC)#
 * I have reverted again - please do not re-add until the otrs is confirmed. noq (talk) 19:06, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Re Category:Descendants of Rabbi Meir Katzenellenbogen
I see you have been adding multiple individuals to this category. Can I ask what source you are using to justify this? AndyTheGrump (talk) 06:16, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you, Andy. The primary source is Neil Rosenstein's book, The Unbroken Chain, Volumes 1 & 2. It's referenced in List of Notable Descendants of Meir Katzenellenbogen. Please let me know if you have any suggestions. I'm fairly new to editing on Wikipedia and very much appreciate guidance. MerlinsMagic (talk) 06:27, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Andy, the source is 100% strong. If you'd like me to email, sms or fax you the actual family lineage, let me know and I'll be happy to do so. Please do not revert the edits. I'm working very diligently to contribute to Wikipedia and would appreciate knowing that you don't undo the contributions I've made without checking first. Thank you again and much appreciation. MerlinsMagic (talk) 06:32, 1 December 2012 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry, but without evidence that Neal Rosenstein's genealogy is accepted as a reliable source by others in the field - which would necessarily be historians of academic credibility - I can't really see how his work can be used as a source. I can find but a single reference to Rosenstein via Google scholar for example - and that is to his book. It is of course possible that the individuals you have included in the category are indeed descended from Rabbi Katzenellenbogen - but we will need evidence from other credible sources that Rosenstein's genealogy is accepted as valid before we can justify the category. Do you have any links to reviews of Rosenstein's work in academic journals for example? From the NYT review of the book - which seems to suggest that Rosenstein claims to have traced the Katzenellenbogen line back to Adam himself - one has to ask whether this is properly-founded historical research, or speculation. If it is the latter, it doesn't belong in Wikipedia. AndyTheGrump (talk) 06:49, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Here's the review in NYT: http://www.tali.com/neilr/UBC_NYT.html.

And the listing on google books: http://books.google.com/books/about/The_unbroken_chain.html?id=lGpmAAAAMAAJ

Also, here's an article about Rabbi Meir's father from Wikipedia, which also references the NYT Magazine of Rosenstein's book. Saul Wahl. I trust you agree the graphic from the NYT Magazine feature pretty much tells the story, less a few thousand others. MerlinsMagic (talk) 07:04, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

MerlinsMagic (talk) 07:00, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Here's another NYT review: Dan Rottenberg, “Finding our Fathers,” The New York Times, May 2, 1977. MerlinsMagic (talk) 07:25, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

It's actually from New York Magazine and should read: Dan Rottenberg, “Finding our Fathers,” New York Magazine, May 2, 1977. MerlinsMagic (talk) 07:27, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Andy, before saying things like I'm "citing no source whatsoever," please see cited sources. Here's a list including the book, NYTimes, New York Magazine, and a respected genealogist. Is there something else you're looking for? It's hard for me to understand why you make such harsh statements without knowing what you're talking about in this case. I so much appreciate everyone who works hard to contribute to Wikipedia. I don't think it's good to chase away new contributors by putting statements out there that are inaccurate. Unless that's the goal.


 * Neil Rosenstein The Unbroken Chain: Biographical Sketches and Genealogy of Illustrious Jewish Families from the 15th-20th Century Volume 1 & 2:C.I.S. Publishers, The Computer Center for Jewish Genealogy, Elizabeth, NJ, 1990. ISBN 0-9610578-4-X.
 * Israel Shenker, "Now, Jewish Roots," The New York Times Magazine. [76]
 * Bill Gladstone, "Unbroken Chain Links Diverse Rabbis, Celebrities," Best of Bill Gladstone, October 25, 2011. Retrieved December 1, 2012.[77]
 * Dan Rottenberg, “Finding our Fathers,” New York Magazine, May 2, 1977.

MerlinsMagic (talk) 07:43, 1 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Sorry, but you are making historical claims relating to multiple notable individuals, based on a single source for which I can see little evidence for any recognised academic credibility - which is the standard required for such material, see Identifying reliable sources (history). I suggest that you look for any material to establish such credibility (academic reviews, evidence that Rosenstein's genealogy has been cited in academic works, etc) and then raise the matter at the Reliable sources/Noticeboard, where we can get input from others - there is little point in just the two of us debating the question, and others may have further information. AndyTheGrump (talk) 15:29, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you, Andy. I appreciate your perspective, expertise and guidance. I thought I had provided what you requested through the New York Times, New York Magazine and other sources. I'm grateful for the chance to have others help us sort through this. As a relative newcomer, how do we get that process moving forward? Your help would be appreciated. Thank you again. MerlinsMagic (talk) 16:24, 1 December 2012 (UTC)


 * As I said above, we'd need evidence from academic historians or similar to establish the reliability of Rosenstein on a matter like this - and a search on 'Google scholar' at least suggests that there may not be any such material. Thinking about this further though, I have to ask whether being a descendent of Rabbi Katzenellenbogen is notable (by Wikipedia standards) anyway? As was pointed out during a recent discussion over a category (now deleted) of descendants of Charlemagne (see ) the consensus seems to be that 'descent' categories are of little encyclopaedic note, even for the most notable individuals - 'Category:Descendants of Queen Victoria' for example was deleted - and furthermore, the further one goes back in time, if an individual has left any living descendants at all, it becomes statistically more likely that everyone from the same community/ethnicity now living will be descended from them, via one line or another - and a category that included say most individuals of Ashkenazi Jewish descent would be of little merit. On this basis, even if Rosenstein's work is accepted as a reliable source, there seems little chance that the category will be seen as suitable for Wikipedia. AndyTheGrump (talk) 16:57, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you again. I trust your experience and that you've got a better sense of what fits for Wikipedia. For me, the fascinating part of this that I believe makes it worth sharing is the connection between so many notable, yet very distinct pursuits in business, religion, government, etc. that trace back directly to the same source. As mentioned above, I'd appreciate knowing more about the process of getting others involved in the discussion. I'm sure it will help me better understand how to contribute my time and expertise and also advance the shared vision for Wikipedia. I'd appreciate further guidance on process and any specific suggestions/recommendations you have. MerlinsMagic (talk) 17:06, 1 December 2012 (UTC)


 * As I've suggested, asking whether Rosenstein's work meets our requirements on the Reliable sources/Noticeboard might be the way to start - assuming that you have already read Identifying reliable sources (history), and still think it is worth trying. Frankly though, given my doubts regarding whether the category itself meets our notability standards, the question may be moot. I'm not at this point going to propose that the category be deleted, but I'd suggest that precedent suggests that it has little hope of remaining if such a deletion is proposed. Genealogy is a fascinating subject, but that doesn't make every genealogical fact necessarily noteworthy. As noted above, it seems statistically almost certain that any living individual of European descent (which would include me) is a descendant of Charlemagne, and I've seen the same suggested (perhaps less intuitively) regarding the prophet Mohammed - that most living Europeans are very likely descended from him too, via one line or another. As for whether I'm also descended from Rabbi Katzenellenbogen, I've no idea, but it doesn't seem that improbable, on similar statistical grounds. Ultimately, if one goes back far enough, one can trace (via genetics rather than genealogy) everyone to single individuals on the direct matrilineal line and the direct patrilineal one - and a category of say 'descendants of Mitochondrial Eve' would be rather pointless. AndyTheGrump (talk) 17:29, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you, Andy. Based on your helpful guidance, I've reviewed the WP discussions, guidelines and further researched the primary source material (Rosenstein's "The Unbroken Chain." I've included the key information at Talk:List_of_Notable_Descendants_of_Meir_Katzenellenbogen. I'd appreciate you having a look at it and letting me know if you have further guidance or helpful suggestions. Thank you. MerlinsMagic (talk) 19:56, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Julius Klein (general), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hearst (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of PAIRS Foundation


A tag has been placed on PAIRS Foundation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here.  DGG ( talk ) 04:28, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Good work
Good work on the Death of Daniel Wultz article, improving it and adding plenty of references. ... disco spinster   talk  13:40, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Thank you! Your assistance and guidance made a big difference. I'm grateful and look forward to contributing to more articles. Much appreciation. MerlinsMagic (talk) 13:42, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of List of descendants of Meir Katzenellenbogen for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of descendants of Meir Katzenellenbogen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of descendants of Meir Katzenellenbogen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. הסרפד (call me Hasirpad) 21:44, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Susannah Heschel.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Susannah Heschel.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:59, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Antonio Arias (footballer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chilean. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Martin Kratt Rhino Power.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Martin Kratt Rhino Power.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:36, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Carrfour Supportive Housing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tomas Regalado. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

August 2016
Hello! Thank you for your recent contributions to The Pride Center at Equality Park. I did have one note for you. I am working on a maintenance project to clean up Category:Pages using infoboxes with thumbnail images. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

SomeImage.jpg

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks!! Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 04:52, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Hard Rock Stadium. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Mlpearc ( open channel ) 17:22, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Thank you, Mlpearc, for your comments. I did not intend to cause any disruptive editing and am not sure what you mean by that. If you can provide more information to help me understand why contribution of the images was not helpful (and considered "disruptive"), please do so I can be sure not to do so again. MerlinsMagic (talk) 18:31, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Martin Kratt.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Martin Kratt.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Stephanie Berman-Eisenberg.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Stephanie Berman-Eisenberg.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ~ Rob 13 Talk 04:15, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Select Survey Invite
I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they affect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take no more than 1-2 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.

Your survey Link: https://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9S3JByWf57fXEkR?Q_DL=56np5HpEZWkMlr7_9S3JByWf57fXEkR_MLRP_885Pr8dh1NMhx4h&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 20:08, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

October 2020
Hello MerlinsMagic. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:MerlinsMagic. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. numerous homeless/veteran organizations. Graywalls (talk) 02:36, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Reply to Graywalls
Thank you Graywalls. I do not nor have I ever received compensation or any type of inducement for my contributions to Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MerlinsMagic (talk • contribs) 21:11, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * thank you for clarifying you are not getting compensation specifically for editing Wikipedia. Do you happen to have professional relationship with anything you have edited? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Graywalls (talk • contribs) 06:19, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Graywalls (talk) 20:47, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:PAIRS Foundation logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:PAIRS Foundation logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Daniel Cantor Wultz.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Daniel Cantor Wultz.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Im The IP (talk) 19:42, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

July 2023
The Wikipedia namespace is not the main space of the encyclopedia and not an appropriate place to move your content as you did here. The articles for creation process exists for a good reason, and allows newer and less experienced editors to work on content and get feedback. Please make use of it. Melcous (talk) 10:37, 23 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Done, how do I get feedback to prepare the article for main space? Thank you. MerlinsMagic (talk) 10:39, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Articles for creation explains the process, including how to submit for review. Thanks Melcous (talk) 10:41, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, MerlinsMagic. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Lori Heyman Gordon, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the edit COI template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see );
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see );
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. It appears you have a connection with PAIRS FOUNDATION in one way or another, and the article you're contemplating to move into main space is highly interrelated to PAIRS. Graywalls (talk) 07:46, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Coalition for Divorce Reform for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Coalition for Divorce Reform, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Coalition for Divorce Reform until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Coalition for Divorce Reform (logo).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Coalition for Divorce Reform (logo).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 23:50, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Lori Heyman Gordon
Hello, MerlinsMagic. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lori Heyman Gordon, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:07, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Lori Heyman Gordon


Hello, MerlinsMagic. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lori Heyman Gordon".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:33, 8 March 2024 (UTC)