User talk:Merphant

Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need any questions answered about the project then check out Help or drop me a line. BTW, I like what you have done with the place. Cheers! --maveric149

Please check Musical genre. You and I just collided and something you did may have been lost. Ortolan88 14:36 Aug 1, 2002 (PDT)

Santa Cruz Operation is listed as created by you, today (Oct 3), as a new page. I could have sworn the page existed before today. Have I lost my mind?


 * It doesn't appear to have existed previously under that title, but Merphant seems to have cut-n-pasted it from the long-existing SCO, then redirected that page to the new one. Merphant, you might want to check out How to rename a page for a cleaner way to rename/move pages. (Which I've just performed on the page in question.) --Brion 10:21 Oct 3, 2002 (UTC)

Hi - I just extended the dynamics article, and made all of your little stubs on dynamic indications (forte, fortissimo and pianissimo) redirects to there. Hope you don't mind. I think it's better this way, because I can't think of a way to make those little articles more than stubs, and they're all closely linked anyway, so I think it's best to have all the stuff in one place. --Camembert


 * You're right, it is better this way. I made those because they were empty articles linked from a prominent page like music basic topics. I tend to make a lot of stubby articles which should probably be combined, like F clef, G clef, etc. as in the discussion on Talk:treble clef. My strategy is to fill in the badly needed info first, then go back and polish later. -- Merphant


 * I think that's a pretty good strategy, and you're doing pretty well by it :)  I like what you did with clef by the way - I added a couple of comments to the talk page there. --Camembert

I do wish you wouldn't keep altering/redirecting flautist. A flautist is the British term for flutist, based on the word flauto, and retained due to 18th Century Italian influence. If you don't want to have this, perhaps you can suggest some other way round the problem. DM


 * I thought it redundant to have an article for both flutist and flautist; let's pick one (obviously I chose flutist, but if you prefer flautist, well let's call the whole thing off ;-) -- Merphant

In a sense it is redundant, but I can't see how to get the different term in otherwise. Flautist is commonly used in the UK, and perhaps other European countries, but flutist is (apparently) commoner elsewhere. Can you think of a way of including the following text ....

Flautist: British term for flutist, based on Italian word flauto, and adopted due to 18th Century Italian influence. Outside the United Kingdom it is more common to refer to flutists or flute players.

Also, is there some way that using "flautist" will actually link directly to this text - I'm not sure if Wikipedia has something similar to the internal labels for URLs/HTML - see www.xyz123.com#link 34 for example.

Actually - I think I'll fix it - I'll edit flutist.

Have done it - think it's much better - hope you do too. Best wishes DM.


 * Ok, glad we got that resolved :) -- Merphant

Actually you might also be able to help - I don't think that the flute head joint is ever hyperbolic - see flute - I've made an amendment - I'm 90% sure this must be incorrect - they are parabolic surely? OK - so you altered the text - that's OK - but we should know for sure whether the interior can ever be a hyperbola - I think not.


 * They probably are parabolic. I'll just delete the hyperbola part. -- Merphant

OK - thanks - that makes sense. Is this the "right" way to communicate, or are we supposed to use "Talk" - I haven't a clue - only just started (a few days back). It seems to work! DM.

Moved from User:Merphant/sandbox:

Suggestion make the image pages redirects to the apropriate piece article.


 * That would be neat, click on a piece, go to the article. I'm not sure how to do that; making the image pages redirect seems like a bad idea, though. This is actually just a testbed for a chess gameboard like the ones in Lir and Ram-Man's chess games. -- Merphant

is it possible to have just the image without a background? Lir 00:14 Nov 21, 2002 (UTC)

http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/A00_Sokolsky_Opening


 * I'm not sure what you mean. The images in my sandbox should have a transparent background; they do in Mozilla, at least. The ones in the article linked above are of somewhat better quality; they seem to be the same pictures, just scaled and shaded a little. I also found some public domain chess books on the internet which have some very nice images: look here for an example. These would be very easy to convert to usable PNGs. -- Merphant


 * I've uploaded the new images. They look nice, but they are a bit larger than the old ones (like twice as big). -- Merphant

Just read your note about the musical terms lists - quite fair. I like meddling too!

Also, I like the chess board - if it were easier to edit, Wikipedeans could take time out to play chess - when they get bored with playing with Wikipedia, that is! -- User:David Martland


 * I've tried to make it a bit easier to edit, with coordinate ids for each table cell. There is some discussion of wiki table syntax on meta-wikipedia, but who knows if/when this will happen. I'm actually pretty bad at chess, but I thought it would be fun; also, some of the chess pages might be able to use it, like the Sokolsky opening linked above. -- Merphant

Sorry, I was just including some translations. Well I will wait that we set up a clear policy on inclusion of words English-English dictionary versus English-Other language dictionary. Regards -- Youssefsan

Oups. I didn't catch what you mean. I thouht it was a list of words by alphabetical order, since the link was on the main page next to by topic. Youssefsan

Modern Art is NOT contemporary art. Please do a little research and fix this article. Thank you.....DW


 * I'll leave it to you and others who know more about the topic. -- Merphant

Hi,

In Harmonic series I am slightly confused by this: "The fundamental is called a pedal note or pedal tone and can be faked." From my point of view as a trumpet player, pedal notes are mostly fakes, but the fundamental isn't a fake, though I think people do call it a pedal note. Or maybe not, I'm really not sure. In other words, the "real" range of the instrument goes down to, say, a concert E, then a good player can fill in with a pedal D and C - which are not fundamentals of anything, as they are too high - before getting down to a Bb which I suppose is the fundamental being one octave below the 2nd harmonic Bb which is the lowest "normal" note. I should add that when I play any of these notes they sound rubbish, and that the Bb is very very out of tune - only on my flugel do I get a good, in-tune Bb presumably becase the physics is so different.

Oh dear, this is a pretty annoying paragraph really, I'm sorry - all I've done is to say that there is something wrong with what you've written then admit I haven't got a clue how to fix it! Hm let me think. OK. (1) I am not sure the fundamental is called a pedal tone; (2) I am sure that the intermediate notes below the normal range but above the open or 1st position fundamental are pedal notes; (3) I am sure that these intermediate notes are faked, as they do not fit the harmonic series; (4) I think that the fundamental is not really a fake, as it belongs in the harmonic series, and is certainly not a fake in the same sense as those intermediate pedals are.

Does that make any kind of sense at all??!! Sorry! :) Nevilley 08:32 Mar 25, 2003 (UTC)


 * It makes a lot of sense; it's a very interesting question. I did a little research; see Talk:Harmonic series (music). -- Merphant

Wiktionary-WordNet

You have a message at wiktionary:User talk:Merphant. --Menchi 07:12 May 7, 2003 (UTC)

Thank you thank you thank you for creating the art history article. hard to believe that such an article didn't yet exist. Kingturtle 22:32 7 Jun 2003 (UTC)


 * My pleasure. I just wish I knew more about it; the current page is pretty weak. Something to look into when I have the time, I guess. -- Merphant

Congratulations, you have just been made a sysop! You have volunteered for boring housekeeping activities which normal users sadly cannot participate in. Sysops basically can't do anything: They cannot delete pages arbitarily (only obvious junk like "jklasdfl,öasdf JOSH IS GAY"), they cannot protect pages in an edit war they are involved in, they cannot ban signed in users. What they can do is delete junk as it appears, ban anonymous vandals, remove pages that have been listed on Votes for deletion for more than a week, protect pages when asked to by other members, and help keep the few protected pages there are, among them the precious Main Page, up to date.

Note that almost everything you can do can be undone, so don't be too worried about making mistakes. You will find more information at Administrators, please take a look before experimenting with your new powers. Drop me a message if there are any questions or if you want to stop being a sysop (could it be?). Have fun! --Eloquence 21:15 14 Jul 2003 (UTC)

Hi, you cast a vote in the TEMP5 debate. The Temp5 proposal was voted down by 61.3% to 38.6%. We seem to be going around in circlces on the whole issue of the main page. A new vote is now taking place to clarify what exactly we want, namely
 * 1) Do we actually want to have a new page?
 * 2) If so when (immediately, after a pause, timed to the press release, etc)?
 * 3) What do people want on the front page and what do they want excluded?

As of now, the whole issue seems surrounded by complete confusion. This way, finally and definitively, we will know what we want and when we want it. So do please express your opinions. The vote is on the same page as the previous votes. FearÉIREANN 20:17, 13 Aug 2003 (UTC)

Wow! That's amazing. Much better than my old thing. I took that link away anyway as I realised it didn't work at all in Mozilla and I hadn't got round to fixing it yet. I won't need to now - yours is much more impressive! Angela 01:01, Sep 15, 2003 (UTC)


 * Hope you don't mind but I switched my link to yours at Friends of Wikipedia/Miscellaneous. Angela 17:26, Sep 17, 2003 (UTC)

Art history
Thanks. --Alex S 02:31, 19 Sep 2003 (UTC) Question: How does one become a sysop?

Sandbox
Hi, I replied in the sandbox, but I thought I'd better repeat it here as things aren't guaranteed to stay there. I find the interlanguage links in the sandbox useful for when I want to go to a sandbox of another Wikipedia. I wouldn't know where to find them otherwise. Angela. 00:01, Feb 24, 2004 (UTC)

quick note on cal
great job on redoing cal. Goodralph 08:00, 5 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Art categories
Hi,

I noticed that you have recently been active in categorising the visual arts. Can I also encourage you to join the categorisation discussion at Category talk:Art -- Solipsist 21:25, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Your pic
Thanks for creating and uploading Image:Sixteenth notes and rest.png and Image:Sixteenth note run.png. I notice they currently don't have image copyright tags. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use if you release it under the GFDL, etc.) Thanks so much,    – Quadell (talk) (help)   01:57, Oct 5, 2004 (UTC)


 * Ok, done. -- Merphant 08:55, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)

A Request
Over at Culture of the United Kingdom one of the main things that is stopping us from putting it forward as a featured article candidate is the fact that the art section is so small (one small paragraph). You have listed yourself on List of Wikipedians by fields of interest as someone with an interest in art. Would you be able to pop over there at some point and help us to expand the section please? Many thanks. -- Graham &#9786; | Talk 11:54, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I live in California and have never been to the UK. I really don't know much about it. I'll be interested in reading what you all come up with, though :) Merphant 02:48, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
 * Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
 * Multi-Licensing Guide
 * Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the " " template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:


 * Option 1
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR
 * Option 2
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions to any U.S. state, county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace " " with "  ". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Image copyrights: chess images.
Hi! Do you know the copyright status of the following images? Are they from a copyrighted Unicode font, or did you roll them yourself? Any help would be appreciated.


 * Image:Chess black bishop.png
 * Image:Chess black king.png
 * Image:Chess black knight.png
 * Image:Chess black pawn.png
 * Image:Chess black queen.png
 * Image:Chess black rook.png
 * Image:Chess white bishop.png
 * Image:Chess white king.png
 * Image:Chess white knight.png
 * Image:Chess white pawn.png
 * Image:Chess white queen.png
 * Image:Chess white rook.png

grendel|khan 03:40, 2005 Jan 4 (UTC)

Image:2 against 3.mid
Burgundavia (&#9992; take a flight?) 09:20, May 21, 2005 (UTC)

Image:3 against 4.mid
Burgundavia (&#9992; take a flight?) 09:31, May 21, 2005 (UTC)

Image copyright
Thanks for that. For the future, Public domain stuff you create yourself can be tagged as cheers, Burgundavia (&#9992; take a flight?) 05:44, May 24, 2005 (UTC)

Bryce Harrington
Hi -- Since you've ben working on the Inkscape article, I thought you might be interested to know that the Bryce Harrington article is currently being voted on for deletion. --Bcrowell 16:13, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Toolserveraccount
Hello Merphant, please write an eMail with your prefer login-name, your realname und the public part of your ssh-key to zedler-admins@wikimedia.org. I will create your account soon, when I get your eMail. --84.58.193.118 12:50, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Re: WP:TEST
The sub-question change was the only modification I made; I haven't much experience with Perl. :P æle ✆ 2006-05-25t20:12z

Image:Musical keyboard.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Musical keyboard.png, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you.

Problem with the automated Wikiholic test
Hi Merphant -- I've been contacted by a user concerning your Wikiholic script. In short, the link points to a blank page on tools.wikipedia.de. No perl or HTML code, not even a stray alphanumeric character -- literally nothing. Do you have any idea what might be going on? If you decided to remove this useful tool, I apologize for not seeing your announcement. -- llywrch 22:06, 26 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The problem was a small bug in the script, which I have now fixed. Thanks, Merphant 06:54, 27 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Thank you both Llwyrch and ele-maid for helping fix the test. ;-) | A ndonic O   Talk  10:11, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * And thanks to Merphant for his prompt attention to this matter! -- llywrch 20:19, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Dizzy Gillespie
noticed you started the page a while back - check it out now, lot's of changes and a touch of controversy about the opening paragraph.--Smkolins 23:37, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:A_flat.png
Thanks for uploading Image:A_flat.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:09, 29 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Shyam ( T / C ) 13:09, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:C_sharp.png
Thanks for uploading Image:C_sharp.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:12, 29 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Shyam ( T / C ) 13:12, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Prefs_help_-_misc.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Prefs_help_-_misc.png, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:20, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Prefs_help_-_text_time.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Prefs_help_-_text_time.png, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:21, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Timeline of trends in music
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Timeline of trends in music, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Timeline of trends in music fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: '''The individual "Timeline of trends in music" pages were all deleted. This page now serves no purpose.''' To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Timeline of trends in music, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Timeline of trends in music itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 03:59, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Mark Lawrence
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mark Lawrence, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Mark Lawrence. Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 00:21, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Commons:File:Prefs help - quickbar.png
This file was moved to Commons from English Wikipedia, but some description information may have got lost in the process.

As you are noted as the original uploader, or in the history for the file, it would be appreciated if you could help in reconstructing this information.

Please also consider checking Commons for other media that you may have uploaded locally, but which was subsequently transferred.

Special:Log for uploads can help in this. Thanks for you assistance and keep uploading 'free' media :)Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:49, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

about automated Wikipedia:Wikipediholism_test
Hi, is it possible to have Finnish Wikipediholism_test in automated version? please answer!! thank u!! --Olliii (talk) 13:02, 26 July 2010 (UTC)


 * It is possible; the source code is here: http://toolserver.org/~merphant/wikiholic/wikiholic.pl . I don't want to maintain the Finnish version, but for someone on Finnish Wikipedia who has a toolserver account, or some other web space where they can run cgi scripts, it should be pretty easy to set up. Merphant (talk) 05:48, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Xeno (talk) at 16:54, 9 August 2011 (UTC).

Request for comment
May I request a comment (WP:RFC) at Articles for deletion/Dominant group (art). Marshallsumter (talk) 16:56, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Xeno (talk) at 14:03, 4 September 2011 (UTC).

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

 * See also: Inactive administrators/2011

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. – xeno talk 00:12, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Notice of change
Hello. You are receiving this message because of a [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Administrators&oldid=526254016#Restoration_of_the_tools_.28proposal.29 recent change] to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFA. Thank you.  MBisanz  talk 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Musical score listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Musical score. Since you had some involvement with the Musical score redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 07:55, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Plastic in art for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Plastic in art is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Plastic in art until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Mdann 52   talk to me!  16:37, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Definition of art listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Definition of art. Since you had some involvement with the Definition of art redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 01:39, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Infectious mononucleosis


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Infectious mononucleosis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GammaRadiator (talk) 17:05, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

EDIT - I acted too hastily on a troll blanking. Speedy deletion rescinded and article restored. GammaRadiator (talk) 17:08, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Pipe organ
Pipe organ has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 13:41, 22 June 2024 (UTC)