User talk:Merrows2

September 2011
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Nick Clegg. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. In particular, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 16:10, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Your recent edits to Talk:Nick Clegg could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. GB fan please review my editing 01:39, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. Jayron  32  01:54, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Legal threat was issued here: . -- Jayron  32  01:54, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Clegg's arson
Hi there. I have some sympathy with you actually on the Clegg/arson thing. However, I notice that the arson is mentioned in the article, so it is not correct of you to say the public is not being informed of it. What is objected to is you putting it in the lead of the article. --bodnotbod (talk) 09:33, 5 September 2011 (UTC)