User talk:Merrygoround92

Merrygoround92,

Original research is not allowed on Wikipedia. Citations to the US patent office data base constitute original research. If you care to discuss this issue rather than the continuing the string of repeated undos by yourself and other users, I'd be happy to discuss this issues and come to some resolution.

The original article for "Scenera Research" was deemed unsuitable and marked for deletion. Please click on 'Talk' for Scenera Research. You will findthat the citations to the US Patent office, the Scenera Research website, and quotes of individuals do not qualify under Wikipedia's rules.

For example, there is no third party citation that meets Wikipedia rules that I can locate that verifies that Scenera Research is an "independent research company". Scenera Research's website won't do. There are articles from third party sources, however, that indicate Scenera Research licenses patents.

A second example, is that I can find no sources that meet Wikipedia rules that provide any evidence for the existence of "Scenera Labs", other than Scenera Research's own website.

Still further, the US patent office citations do not identify any of the "categories" or "areas of research" that were cited in your version of the article. The citations simply identify patents and patent applications. The "categories" and "areas of research" are opinion. Opinion is not allowed. If you can find a suitable citation that identifies these areas, that's fine. Until then, they're not allowed as I understand the rules.

These are the types of things, that cause me to remove and edit content.

If we can't work this out via "Talk" pages and the pattern of undos continues, I will identify this page for dispute resolution. If that fails, I or we can request that a Wikipedia editor review the page and make a final decision.

Wikipedia editors are busy people. I'd hate to have to bring them in to resolve this issue based on Wikipedia's rules which you can read and which are clear about what is allowable and what is not.

You should keep in mind that all the edits and back and forth are public. I don't know whether Scenera Research is behind the information that is not suitable content, but my guess that this pattern of activity around the Scenera Research article is not in Scenera Research's best interest.

If you're trying to help Scenera Research, I think it's in Scenera Research's interest that you know and follow the rules. --Ardvarkface (talk) 00:44, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Scenera Research". Thank you. --Zepheydog (talk) 22:54, 16 June 2012 (UTC)