User talk:Mersedeh Abedini

Jamshid arian assl
Hi,

As you have capitalized Jamshid Arian Assl's name in the intro sentence, and presuming this to be correct, you might consider rationalizing the articles name with capitals, to Jamshid Arian Assl. Good article. Acabashi (talk) 09:43, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Spoke too soon really - an obvious copyright violation, so I'm afraid it will have to be tagged as such for deletion. Acabashi (talk) 09:49, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because you already have at least one other account, and one of your accounts has been used to remove a speedy deletion tag from an article created by another one. Whatever may have been your intention in doing that, it gives the impression of using multiple accounts to get round policies, which is known as sockpuppetry, and is not acceptable. You should normally use only one account, unless there are special reasons for doing otherwise. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 17:19, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

I have read your email, but I don't fully understand it. You say "without any logical reasons some members seem to approach to criticize and deleted biographical article", and you refer to "editors' questions", which you say "were not logical". However, you give no indication of what questions these were, or where they are to be found. No "questions" were asked on that article's talk page, nor on this page, nor on the talk page of your other accounts that I know of, nor anywhere else that I can see. Have questions been asked to you via yet another account that I don't know of? Perhaps you can clarify. The only edits made by this account (apart from creating a user page) were to one article, which was deleted as a copyright infringement. Apart from Wikipedia's policies, the law requires us to remove any material which infringes copyright, so I don't see that as deletion "without any logical reasons". There are other aspects of your email which I found difficult to understand, too. For example, you say "every time as I started to give out related biographical information", which implies that you have tried to write the article more than once, though this account has done so only once. After wasting a considerable amount of my time I found that you seem to have at least three accounts, and that one of them had posted a copy of the article on its talk page. It would have saved me considerable time and trouble had you given me the full relevant facts. If you make any further communication on this, please disclose every account which you have, as that will make it easier to find the edits which you are referring to. At present I have no idea what "questions" you are referring to, nor what "policies about the Internet IP System" you are referring to, so I have no way of answering your query.

A user talk page is for discussion relating to editing the encyclopaedia, not for holding copies of articles, or article-like content which has not been posted as an article. That is why the user-talk page pseudo-article was removed.

The exact meaning of your statement that "Wikipedia is a global on line press distributer" is not clear to me, but taking this together with "I wanted him to be introduced to other people", it looks rather as though you think of Wikipedia exists as a medium to promote and propagate information about someone you wish to publicise. If so, unfortunately you have not understood Wikipedia's nature: I suggest looking at the policy on what Wikipedia is not.

Any further communication should be done from your original account: using this account while you still have the first one available is not acceptable. Unless there are particular reasons for preferring email, such as confidentiality, it is also usually preferable to communicate via Wikipedia's talk pages. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:29, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Since writing the above, I have discovered that you have yet another account, which has repeatedly recreated the same promotional article, despite a deletion discussion which resulted in a consensus to delete it. I also see that that account indulged in various kinds of disruptive editing, such as repeatedly removing maintenance templates, and was eventually blocked indefinitely. I am not at all happy about the time and trouble I have wasted on trying to find out exactly what you were referring to so that I could help you, assuming that you were editing in good faith, only to find that you are a persistent disruptive editor who has created several accounts to evade a block, recreated an article repeatedly against consensus, repeatedly created it with slightly different titles to evade page protection, and ignored all the messages other editors have sent you to try to help you. (And "not at all happy" is a politer way of expressing my feelings than I originally intended to.) I have blocked the remaining accounts I discovered which were not already blocked. Wikipedia is not a medium for your self-promotion: please leave Wikipedia, and try to publicise yourself somewhere else. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:04, 14 April 2011 (UTC)