User talk:Mertk9

Image tagging for Image:ArtOlivier.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:ArtOlivier.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 10:41, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:ArtMid2.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:ArtMid2.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 04:38, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

October 2016
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. You have been undone three times now. Discuss it on the talk page or leave it alone. You should read WP:RS more carefully. Anonymous YouTube videos are not reliable sources. If we could prove that these videos were uploaded by Art Olivier then they would be acceptable as sources, but only for information about himself. Per WP:SELFSOURCE they would not be acceptable sources for the apocalyptic event since it is an exceptional claim, involve claims about third parties, and there is reasonable doubt as to its authenticity since we don't kinow who posted the material (as far as I can see). Unless you can prove that the YouTube videos were put up by Olivier and that he is an established expert whose work in the relevant field has been published by reliable third-party publications, this material also fails the exceptions listed in WP:USERGENERATED
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Furthermore, is Art Olivier even the same person? His article makes no mention of this topic. If you are linking to someone else's Wikipage this could be seen as a WP:BLP attack on the person whose page you are linking to. Meters (talk) 00:40, 18 October 2016 (UTC)