User talk:MerylNanRader

there's absolutely no reason to remove content that that is supported by citations and that does not infringe on wikipedia's guidelines - if you want to remove content, you must provide reasons. I understand you might not appreciate the negative publicity our amendments might bring on, but there is no ground to arbitrarily remove content to satisfy commercial interests. I will bring back the edits again and again until we have to involve RfC. MerylNanRader has only edited the vestergaad frandsen article, so we suspect you're a entry-level clerk paid by the frandsen corporation to disseminate lies. let's involve RfC and then the media. I'm sure i'll work out great for you guys.

Deletion discussion about Mikkel Vestergaard Frandsen
Hello, MerylNanRader,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Mikkel Vestergaard Frandsen should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Mikkel Vestergaard Frandsen.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Devopam (talk) 09:59, 11 January 2017 (UTC)