User talk:Meryllid

Jan-Willem Breure
Hi. Thank you for releasing copyright on the text you are trying to insert into Jan-Willem Breure, however you should read our guide at Donating copyrighted materials and then take the required steps. Until we have some evidence that the original copyright holder has released permission then it will continue to be treated as a copyright violation. On a separate point, if you are representing Jan-Willem Breure then you should also read our guidelines on autobiographies and conflicts of interest. Road Wizard (talk) 14:27, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The main issue that you need to deal with is to find reliable, independent sources that cover the subject of the article. For example, if a music magazine has run an article on Jan-Willem Breure then citing it as a reference will be very useful. Likewise if he has received an award then mentioning it helps to justify notability. If reliable third party sources can't be found then it is likely the article will be deleted. Road Wizard (talk) 14:34, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

December 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Jan-Willem Breure has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odgNsoCkS40 (matching the regex rule \byoutube\.com). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. Video links are also strongly deprecated by our guidelines for external links, partly because they're useless to people with slow internet connections. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 11:32, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jan-Willem Breure


A tag has been placed on Jan-Willem Breure, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Bgwhite (talk) 09:13, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Are All Men Pedophiles? for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Are All Men Pedophiles? is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Are All Men Pedophiles? (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. AGK [•] 12:38, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Content policy
Hi Meryllid, thank you for your contributions, but I noticed that at least one of your edits contained original research. You combined sources which do not mention the film in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please use sources which a) are directly related to the topic of the article, and b) directly support the material being presented. Thank you. --Sonicyouth86 (talk) 22:44, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

April 2015
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Misandry. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Neil N  talk to me 15:12, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Are All Men Pedophiles?. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. --Sonicyouth86 (talk) 23:31, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. ''Please stop uploading copyright violations and/or images with incompatible licenses. You've been warned enough on Commons.'' Neil N  talk to me 23:56, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Note
I will be reporting your repeated license violations on Commons. --Neil N  talk to me 21:12, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Add the photo again with an incompatible license and my next step will be WP:ANI. You need to read and understand Image_use_policy. --Neil N  talk to me 12:09, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

ANI discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Sonicyouth86 (talk) 18:21, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for not being here to create an encyclopedia as detailed here. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Bishonen &#124; talk 20:12, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: Please note that indefinite does not mean infinite. If you appeal the block in a way that shows you understand the problems with unreliable sources, copyright violations, and lack of talkpage discussion (you neither edit article talkpages, nor respond to warnings and advice on your own) and will undertake to avoid them in the future — then an uninvolved admin may well unblock you. If somebody is prepared to do that, they don't need to consult me. Bishonen &#124; talk 20:15, 22 April 2015 (UTC).