User talk:Messier83

Welcome!
Hello, Messier83, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Brad Jefferson, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  GILO  A& E&uArr;  22:27, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Brad Jefferson


A tag has been placed on Brad Jefferson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here.  GILO  A& E&uArr;  22:27, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Animoto and Brad Jefferson
You asked me and OrangeMike about these pages. What he said is what I think too about the company page. Let me add that you would do much better not to try to make a page about both the company and the executive,--rather one or the other; I think it's clear that the sources are more likely to be about the company. Remember that you need references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases. Profiles on Crunchbase or Forbes, etc., and not independent sources, and announcements of funding are not substantial coverage. . Full reviews of the company's products of a web site are good sources, and so is a truly independent article about the firm. Interviews tend to be questionable, if they just let the founder say whatever he cares to say. Concentrate on the best sources. Include only material that would be of interest to a general reader coming across the mention of the subject and wanting the sort of information that would be found in an encyclopedia. Do not include material that would be of interest only to those associated with the subject, or to prospective clients or users--that sort of content is considered promotional. As a general rule, a suitable page will be best written by someone without Conflict of Interest; it's not impossible to do it properly with a conflict of interest or as a paid press agent, but it's relatively more difficult: you are automatically thinking in terms of what the subject wishes to communicate to the public, but an uninvolved person will think in terms of what the public might wish to know. Marketers think of products as a set of benefits, but on Wikipedia, products have to be described by what they do.

If you think you can do it right according to our guidelines, do so, but expect the article to be carefully checked for objectivity, and for the presence of sources that show notability. The best way of rewriting is to use the WP:Article Wizard, which will guide you towards an acceptable article if one is possible. For further information see our general guides to writing articles, WP:PLAIN and WP:FIRST; see also our list of the things we don't do here, WP:NOT, and our practical guide to conflict of interest, WP:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide — Preceding unsigned comment added by DGG (talk • contribs) 19:34, 11 August 2013‎ (UTC)

Thanks for the advice! I'll look into more substantial references. So should I completely avoid using press releases from the company? Even if I simply state: "In 2010, the company released a new application that allowed users to do such and such." Messier83 (talk) 23:26, 13 August 2013 (UTC)Messier83


 * Okay, well done, it's now back in article space. I think and hope that you have learned a lot from this experience.Deb (talk) 18:38, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Page for creation
Hi Messier 83! I thought based on the work you did on the Animoto page you might like to work on a page for Kizoa, also an online movie making site. You can find some references for the page under the Articles for creation, in the Computer Science, Computing, and Internet category, under Software should you be interested. — Preceding unsigned comment added by A at Kizoa (talk • contribs) 15:17, 3 March 2016 (UTC)