User talk:Mestre.kombato

Kombato
I have to say that your page dose not make that at all clear; under a link translated as 'Customers' is the text "Some of the most important corporations and Brazilian organizations had adopted the Kombato as methodology of security and self-defense" it then lists them by area implying that these organisations use Kombato, I admit to noting Russian characters on the a badge with a fouled anchor (a symbol commonly used by varioud navy and marine forces) and making that assumption, but the UN logo is distinctive, and what is being implied is clear. All that aside, the core point, as far as the deletion debate is concerned, is that it is a primary source so not reliable to support such material in an article and that with out this the art is not of sufficient importance or interest for inclusion, the is also the problem that the article is written with a promotional tone in areas and this conflicts with the wikipedia's aim to treat all subjects dispassionately. I hope this explains some things for you. --Nate1481(t/c) 08:17, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

1. We made worls for UN. Training personnel from the Brazilian Marines (The Blue ones) for the war. The´re sonly two men giving self-defense training for the team, and BOTH are for Kombato. How can I send papers to you to prove that?