User talk:Meszz1

Proposed deletion of Wagner Speed


The article Wagner Speed has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Clear OR/Neologism, per description of source given in article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 22:53, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Wagner Speed for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wagner Speed is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Wagner Speed until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 23:09, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Misplaced comment
You commented on the talk page for the deletion discussion, Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Wagner Speed‎. You should add your comments to the discussion page, Articles for deletion/Wagner Speed‎, to contest the deletion.-- JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 01:15, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Not what Wikipedia is for
Wikipedia is not for things you made up one day. Content on Wikipedia must be notable and verifiable through reliable sources. - The Bushranger One ping only 04:21, 15 June 2012 (UTC)