User talk:MetaWiz4331

Your submission at Articles for creation: Francisco Labbe (July 21)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Francisco Labbe and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Francisco Labbe, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Francisco_Labbe Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AngusWOOF&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Francisco_Labbe reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 15:50, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
Hello, I'm NinjaRobotPirate. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Joseph Motiki, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:16, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

BLP discretionary sanctions alert
NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:18, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

September 2019
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Raul Julia. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Binksternet (talk) 15:35, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Daniel Baldwin. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Continued disruption will be met with being blocked from editing, or other sanctions. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 15:35, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dan Li (September 28)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Zanhe were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dan Li and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dan Li, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Dan_Li Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Zanhe&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Dan_Li reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Zanhe (talk) 20:10, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

October 2019
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Andrew Pifko. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. TheBlackKitty (talk) 13:54, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Burton Zucker for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Burton Zucker is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Burton Zucker until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 15:35, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Charlotte Zucker for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charlotte Zucker is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Charlotte Zucker until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 15:38, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gary Stretch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cleitus ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Gary_Stretch check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Gary_Stretch?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Monica Lopera for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Monica Lopera is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Monica Lopera until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:30, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Antonio Magro for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Antonio Magro is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Antonio Magro until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lapablo (talk) 11:44, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rod Wilson (actor)


A tag has been placed on Rod Wilson (actor) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles for deletion/Rod Wilson (actor). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ミラP 21:41, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
ミラP 21:41, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Rod Wilson (actor) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Rod Wilson (actor), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Atlantic306 (talk) 23:55, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

December 2019
Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of Thomas & Friends episodes, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 00:53, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Inventing full names for fictional characters
Please stop inventing full names for fictional charactes, such as. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:03, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of David Sparrow


A tag has been placed on David Sparrow requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles for deletion/David Sparrow. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Celestina007 (talk) 23:07, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * I have compared this to the article deleted via the May 2018 Articles for deletion/David Sparrow and (1) the text and references were substantially similar to the article deleted in 2018 and (2) there was nothing in the 2020 recreation to indicate that the issues raised in the 2018 deletion discussion had been addressed. Please let me know if I can assist you with this or anything else related to the English language Wikipedia. Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 10:20, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Flaminia Cinque, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Waking the Dead ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Flaminia_Cinque check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Flaminia_Cinque?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:31, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Nikhil Parmar moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Nikhil Parmar, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... disco spinster   talk  04:22, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nikhil Parmar


The article Nikhil Parmar has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Does not appear to meet criteria of WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR. Perhaps a case of WP:TOOSOON."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... disco spinster   talk  13:55, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

February 2020
Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Monica Lopera. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Magnolia677 (talk) 17:27, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Monica Lopera. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:16, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Dan Li (actor) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dan Li (actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dan Li (actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:29, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ben Miles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Townsend ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Ben_Miles check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Ben_Miles?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:48, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Matt McCooey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British Japanese ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Matt_McCooey check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Matt_McCooey?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Zoie Palmer BLP
I have reverted your edit of 2 March 2020 in the Zoie Palmer biography. The infobox template contains a hidden message advisory regarding WP:DOB,  WP:BLPSOURCES, and WP:VERIFY, that becomes visible when the Visual and Source edit screens are opened. You added a birth date without providing one or more reliable sources. Even without such an advisory, editors who edit biographies are expected to be familiar with Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP). But edits are particularly unwelcomed when there are advisories and editors ignore them. If you're going to edit a BLP, you need to follow Wikipedia's policy. I see in the thread above ("February 2020") that you were warned about adding "unsourced or poorly sourced content" to another biography. I suggest you take this matter seriously. Pyxis Solitary  (yak). L not Q. 06:37, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Sophie Colquhoun. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:08, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent you from persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:04, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Please do not remove useful links from an article, such as you did in the article Dennis Haysbert, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Rosalina2427 (talk to me) 19:19, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chance Kelly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chicago Fire ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Chance_Kelly check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Chance_Kelly?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited David Lipper, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page It ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/David_Lipper check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/David_Lipper?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:39, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Christian Tessier, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page It ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Christian_Tessier check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Christian_Tessier?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Daniel Adegboyega for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniel Adegboyega is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Daniel Adegboyega until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. dibbydib boop or snoop 03:27, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Graham Harley


A tag has been placed on Graham Harley requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://nowtoronto.com/culture/stage/graham-harley-1942-2010/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ~ Amkgp 💬  03:42, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

List of Puerto Ricans
Hi there, as of 2008, each addition to the list must also provide a reliable verifiable source which cites the person's notability and/or the person's link to Puerto Rico, otherwise the name will be removed. Tony the Marine (talk) 19:53, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Morgan Deare moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Morgan Deare, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 16:24, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Stephen A. Chang


The article Stephen A. Chang has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Working actor, but with no real significant roles, fails WP:NACTOR."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:07, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Rod Wilson (actor)


Hello, MetaWiz4331. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rod Wilson".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:40, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Links to draft articles
Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Gia Crovatin. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:42, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Stephen A. Chang for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stephen A. Chang is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Stephen A. Chang until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Onel 5969  TT me 01:00, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of CJ LeBlanc for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CJ LeBlanc is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/CJ LeBlanc until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JTtheOG (talk) 07:48, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Googy Gress moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Googy Gress, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Htanaungg (talk) 04:04, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Sheldon Bailey
Hi, I've no idea why you moved Draft:Sheldon Bailey to the main space; it was far from ready for publication. I've moved it back, and would appreciate if you let it go through the AfC process. Thanks, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:04, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
 * PS: I was wondering how come you, as a new page reviewer (per your user page), didn't realise this article wasn't ready. But I can't actually find you on the NPR list. What am I missing? --DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:55, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bubba Ganter


A tag has been placed on Bubba Ganter requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0304593/bio. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ASUKITE 13:39, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Junk sources at Gia Crovatin
Given the long term problematic editing by this account, please consider this your only warning: if you utilize another junk source and revert it back in after you're aware it's crap - this account will be blocked. Kuru  (talk)  17:30, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 12:56, 28 September 2021 (UTC)


 * This user has had multiple chances. They were blocked back in 2020 for persistent addition of unsourced content. Their history of creating substandard articles, moving drafts into main space before they are ready, and frequently adding unsourced content to BLPs is obvious. They have never responded to warnings (until now with their feeble unblock request). I did not indef them based solely on 's warning. Putting aside their history before the warning, they violated the warning by twice adding unsourced biographical data to Tom Stourton, once on September 13 and again today.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:02, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
 * These are very excellent points. MetaWiz4331, you'll need to also directly address these to have any chance of an unblock. Essentially, you need to convince Bbb23 as well as the reviewing admin. Please consider your answers carefully. --Yamla (talk) 14:10, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Notice, user has been caught socking. -- ferret (talk) 21:33, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Morgan Deare (November 28)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Morgan Deare and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Morgan Deare, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Morgan_Deare Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:S0091&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Morgan_Deare reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 22:36, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

Saverio Raimondo moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Saverio Raimondo, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Onel 5969  <i style="color:blue">TT me</i> 18:29, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Googy Gress
Hello, MetaWiz4331. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Googy Gress, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Googy Gress


Hello, MetaWiz4331. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Googy Gress".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 21:44, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Morgan Deare
Hello, MetaWiz4331. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Morgan Deare, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Saverio Raimondo
Hello, MetaWiz4331. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Saverio Raimondo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:51, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Apologies to Wikipedia
I am formerly MetaWiz4331, and I am very sorry that I deceived all of you with a non-existent show by adding it to all the pages. Can you ever forgive me? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.215.220.113 (talk) 22:02, 31 October 2023 (UTC)


 * You can send an appeal by email to stewards@wikimedia.org. MarioGom (talk) 15:29, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Morgan Deare


Hello, MetaWiz4331. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Morgan Deare".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 21:32, 12 March 2024 (UTC)