User talk:MetaYvetteFairyMary

November 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Rachel Weisz has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:04, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Rachel Weisz was changed by MetaYvetteFairyMary (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950851 on 2017-11-04T22:04:01+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ghost (Hamlet). Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:08, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ghost (Hamlet) was changed by MetaYvetteFairyMary (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.891212 on 2017-11-04T22:08:41+00:00.

Please stop making disruptive edits. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.  Acroterion   (talk)   22:25, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Women in film. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  22:38, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Acroterion   (talk)   22:49, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Women in film. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  23:02, 12 November 2017 (UTC)