User talk:Metacomp

June 2018
If you are connected to someone or something you have written about (a few examples are writing about yourself, your business, your band, a member of your family, your client) then you should be aware that Wikipedia's conflict of interest guideline discourages you from writing about that subject. The main reason for that is that experience over the years indicates that editors with such a connection to a subject they are writing about are likely to find it very difficult, or even impossible, to stand back from their writing and see how it will look from the detached perspective of an outsider, so that they are likely to write in ways that look promotional to others, even if they sincerely think they are writing in a neutral way. Also, if your editing forms all or part of work for which you are paid, whether as an employee, as a contractor, or in any other capacity, the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require you to state who is paying you, and what your connection to them is. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:43, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Your user name is not compliant with Wikipedia's user name policy, because it indicates that the account represents a business, which is not permitted. I chose not to take action over that when I posted the message above, because I thought that piling that on top of what was said in my message might come across as unnecessarily unfriendly. However, since receiving that message you have edited again without complying with the requirement for disclosure of paid editing which I mentioned. A more detailed account of the requirement than I gave in my brief summary is to be seen at Paid-contribution disclosure. You should read that, and also Conflict of interest.

Because of the problems I have mentioned I have blocked your account from editing. However, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of this page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use, since the present one is not acceptable, and replace "Your reason here" with a statement of why you think you should be unblocked. Your new username will need to meet our username policy, and your statement of why you think you should be unblocked must persuade an administrator that you understand the issues that led to your being blocked, and that you will edit in line with the conflict of interest guidelines and the paid editing requirement. Also, this account must be for one person: Wikipedia policy does not permit shared accounts, and if more than one person in your company intend to edit then they must each have separate accounts.

One more piece of advice. If you do decide to request an unblock then you should read the guide to appealing blocks before doing so, as it will significantly increase the likelihood of your making a request which succeeds. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 17:38, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Metacomp Technologies Inc.


Hello, Metacomp. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Metacomp Technologies Inc.".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 16:32, 8 January 2019 (UTC)