User talk:Metagrossjd10000

Please stop removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages — it is considered vandalism. You may comment at the respective page if you oppose an article's deletion. Thanks. -Royalguard11 (Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 02:47, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Jarod Ticket
A tag has been placed on Jarod Ticket, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. If you plan to add more material to the article, I advise you to do so immediately. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template  to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Kinu t /c  02:50, 16 December 2006 (UTC) Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. -- Kinu t /c  02:50, 16 December 2006 (UTC) Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. -- Kinu t /c  02:52, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:
 * 1) Place   on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
 * 2) Make your case on the article's .
 * Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:
 * 1) place   on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion notice(s)
 * 2) make your case on the article's .

Blanking your talk page
Please do not blank your talk page to remove legitimate warnings; it is considered disruptive. Thank you. -- Kinu t /c  02:54, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Blanking of User talk:Royalguard11
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. -- Kinu t /c  02:57, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Certosa di Pavia
Your recent edit to Certosa di Pavia (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 03:05, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Blocked indefinitely
It has become apparent that your account is only being used for vandalism, so it has been blocked indefinitely. Core desat  03:07, 16 December 2006 (UTC)