User talk:Metalhead865

Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the "sandbox" rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write   below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia. I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! CHAK 001 (talk) 02:23, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of III (Family Force 5 album)


A tag has been placed on III (Family Force 5 album) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Pesky ( talk  …stalk!) 12:04, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Draft:You're So Dead! concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:You're So Dead!, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:51, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:You're So Dead!


Hello, Metalhead865. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "You're So Dead!".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 20:23, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

June 2017
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Wonder Woman (2017 film). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Bennv3771 (talk) 14:14, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Copyright problem on Excess Flesh
Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources and IMDb, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:46, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

July 2017
Hello, I'm KGirlTrucker81. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Paragon (video game), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 13:55, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

I don't know how to find sources for it, I primarily get my information from playing the game itself - should I just ref the website?

A page you started (Steve Aoki Presents Kolony) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Steve Aoki Presents Kolony, Metalhead865!

Wikipedia editor Insertcleverphrasehere just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Requires additional references from Reliable, independent sources."

To reply, leave a comment on Insertcleverphrasehere's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

—  InsertCleverPhraseHere  04:40, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Steve Aoki Presents Kolony moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Steve Aoki Presents Kolony, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. - The   Magnificentist  06:05, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Kiah Roache-Turner for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kiah Roache-Turner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kiah Roache-Turner until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 11:35, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Get Fucked (AKLF album)


A tag has been placed on Draft:Get Fucked (AKLF album), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Legacypac (talk) 06:43, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stefon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Little people ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Stefon check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Stefon?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:08, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

BLP warning
Hi, you made an edit recently that was a serious violation of the biographies of living persons policy. If you edit like that again, you're likely to be blocked indefinitely. Please read the policy carefully and take note of the need for high-quality reliable sources for contentious material about living persons. If you reply to this, be sure not to describe the edit; the policy applies to every page on Wikipedia, including talk pages. Many thanks, SarahSV (talk) 17:11, 26 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Hi, please disregard previous message, I know what edit you're talking about. I suppose I was unaware that the source I provided was unreliable; I've found a news page I can use to confirm that fact. Metalhead865 (talk) 18:18, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I looked for reliable sources and couldn't find any. There would have to be several high-quality sources, and even then the usual practice with serious allegations is to wait until it is pointless for Wikipedia to ignore them. SarahSV (talk) 18:39, 26 March 2018 (UTC)