User talk:Metalhead94

Feel free to leave a message.

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! -- Grrrlriot (♠ ♣ ♦ ♥ †) 21:33, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style


 * It looks like I'm the only person to leave a message on your talkpage. Wow, I feel special. hehe Anyhow, happy editing and welcome to Wikipedia, even though you've been here a couple of months now. Thanks for the message and thanks on my talkpage. -- Grrrlriot (♠ ♣ ♦ ♥ †) 01:46, 24 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I would feel special too ;)--Metalhead94 (talk) 01:57, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I added you to my Wikipedians I Admire page. :) Thanks for your kindness and your thanks! -- Grrrlriot (♠ ♣ ♦ ♥ †) 02:18, 24 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Anytime.--Metalhead94 (talk) 02:23, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Hello
I like your username and I love metal too! -- Grrrlriot (♠ ♣ ♦ ♥ †) 21:33, 23 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Thats cool \m/.--Metalhead94 (talk) 00:45, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Like you, I don't edit many music articles here on Wikipedia. I might once in a while, but rarely. Anyhow, Metal on! \m/ -- Grrrlriot (♠ ♣ ♦ ♥ †) 00:47, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Also, I just replied to your comment on my user talk page. Some IP address reverted your comment on my talk page, so it didn't show up, so I reverted the IP's edit. -- Grrrlriot (♠ ♣ ♦ ♥ †) 04:49, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks.--Metalhead94 (talk) 05:40, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Your welcome. -- Grrrlriot (♠ ♣ ♦ ♥ †) 18:19, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Your Rewards!
Thanks for that intersting post on my talk page. Here, take some cookies. -- MISTER ALCOHOL  TC 05:13, 15 November 2008 (UTC) P.S. I forgot to give this to you. Cheers! ;) -- MISTER ALCOHOL  TC 05:13, 15 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Wow, my first award. Thanks.--Metalhead94 (talk) 14:10, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

WP:DATE
Hi!

I noticed you changed "since 1989" back to "1989 - present" in the Marilyn Manson article. Could you please leave it as it please, as WP:DATE says that was the preferred format? Thanks! Dark Prime (talk) 19:13, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * No problem, I had thought that " Present" was the standard format.--Metalhead94 (talk) 04:17, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I can understand how one could think that since it's pretty much everywhere. But apparently not, as it was changed by a wikipedia administrator in the Gorgoroth article. Dark Prime (talk) 08:32, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Happy Wiki Birthday!
Happy 3rd Wiki Birthday!, have a good day and keep up the good work! Tony (talk) 13:50, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Buspirone
Could you please proofread my edits? 70.137.148.253 (talk) 04:28, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks
Many thanks for tidying up my poor diction in the Zipeprol page. As you can see, I normally restrict myself to finding & adding the original patents because it's one of the few sources available free to all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.30.243.179 (talk) 13:50, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
 * No problem.-- Metalhead94 TC 13:54, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

DHC page
Hi - I wondered what you thought about the page concerning dihydrocodine. The PDSP Ki database shows that the activity of the compound is as a prodrug (O-demethylation to dihydromorphine). The drug, therefore, DOES have a dose-ceiling. The style of the page seems to dwell far too much on the misuse of the drug & is poorly referenced. I wondered if you would take a crack at re-doing it? I think your linguistic skills outstrip mine... thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.30.243.179 (talk) 14:15, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Mitragyna Speciosa
You removed the statement:

"Despite its frequent medicinal use, and relative lack of side effects, Mitragyna Speciosa is frequently implicated in the media as dangerous. Media accusations often assert that Kratom causes a wide variety of unrelated side effects, though reviews of the scientific literature and population reports show these claims to be inaccurate or unfounded. The scientific evidence supporting these assertions is non-existent and Kratom, while taken alone, has never been scientifically proven to pose health risks."

Citing "No citation". However, this is part of the intro. We don't put citations in the introduction. Please see the other sections for the relevant citations. ThorPorre (talk) 14:20, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Strange edit
Adding a space into the word 'movement' was a bit odd? I've rejoined the word. Trafford09 (talk) 19:03, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The edit was a mistake. Thanks for correcting it.-- Metalhead94 TC 20:46, 22 April 2013 (UTC)


 * np Trafford09 (talk) 10:45, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Opting in to VisualEditor
As you may know, VisualEditor ("Edit beta") is currently available on the English Wikipedia only for registered editors who choose to enable it. Since you have made 50 or more edits with VisualEditor this year, I want to make sure that you know that you can enable VisualEditor (if you haven't already done so) by going to your preferences and choosing the item, " ". This will give you the option of using VisualEditor on articles and userpages when you want to, and give you the opportunity to spot changes in the interface and suggest improvements. We value your feedback, whether positive or negative, about using VisualEditor, at VisualEditor/Feedback. Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 20:16, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Buk_missile
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Buk_missile_system&action=history

you will not be able to use any data source except the words for the channel. Buk was used, but may not be. All the evidence is not more than to believe in the words of one ordinary journalist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.105.158.243 (talk) 06:32, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Your most recent edit to Loperamide
Hello. I am confused by your most recent edit to Loperamide. Is there a typo in your edit? It says "is anot opioid medication". I don't understand. Thanks.

JGKlein 14:31, 6 July 2017 (UTC)


 * yes, nothing more than a typi

July 2017
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Mitragyna speciosa. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Alexbrn (talk) 03:14, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

June 2019
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:54, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:11, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

June 2019
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. 331dot (talk) 12:43, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Here on Wikipedia we do care what independent reliable sources state about article subjects, and the terminology that they use. If you have sources that support your claims, you need to discuss the matter on the article talk page, and collaborate with others to achieve a consensus as to what the article should state. 331dot (talk) 12:45, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Principality of Theodoro
Per this discussion, you said you were not going to disrupt Byzantine articles.

Yet, on 12 October 2019 you added Eastern Roman to Principality of Theodoro, without an edit summary. It appears you have been blocked due to this very issue, so it is up to you whether you get blocked again. --Kansas Bear (talk) 18:02, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

While I understand wiki’s guidelines regarding following the wording of the sources, I will restate my opinion that being blocked for calling the polity the “Eastern Roman Empire” is absurd, given that’s literally what it was. And yes I just replied to this post 3 years later. Metalhead94 TC 06:19, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)