User talk:Metalljac

Welcome!
Hello, Metalljac, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Jacques Zafra, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! &mdash;  Masum Ibn Musa  Conversation 13:04, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

How does X work?
Could you tell me please what the problem with this article is?

Metalljac (talk) 13:32, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ See PROD rationale below. If you have any questions, you are always welcome to ask me on my talk page. Happy editing. Sam Sailor Talk! 16:18, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jacques Zafra


The article Jacques Zafra has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Searching for sources on this composer who did his master degree in 2015, it appears to be a Too soon case: the basic notability guideline for people is not met, and no sources were found that would likely make subject notable under the additional criteria for composers.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

How does X work?
I have edited the article, could you tell me please if it now fits the guidelines? Thanks Metalljac (talk) 10:53, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sam Sailor Talk! 16:16, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Contrary to Sam Sailor's suggestion, you (as creator and major contributor) are not permitted to remove the PROD template from the article. The article is a biography of a living person and consequently the rules concerning notability and referencing are applied very strictly.  A search for supporting sources suggests that this person is nowhere near the threshold of notability for inclusion within the project.  I would also note that although references are included, each claim should have an in-line link to the appropriate reference.  As it stands the entire article only has five in-line reference links.


 * If you genuinely took the photo of the subject, as claimed, then this strongly suggests that you have an undisclosed close connection with the article subject. You may therefore be in breach of the conflict of interest policy.  If you do not have a close connection and did not take the photo, then you may be in breach of the copyright of the photo.  These last points needs to be clarified one way or the other.   -- Elektrik  Fanne 11:33, 13 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Part stricken. Per WP:PROD, the creator can delete the PROD tag from the article.  However, as pointed out, it is likely to be proposed for AfD so you will only be delaying the inevitable.   -- Elektrik  Fanne 11:59, 13 June 2016 (UTC)