User talk:Metaphysicswar

Name changes
You really should get agreement for something like this on the talk page. When I search Google books the original name comes up about twice as much as the new one. GScholar shows not much difference between the two). See WP:MOVE. Doug Weller  talk 13:54, 5 September 2016 (UTC)


 * I thought we are looking for common name for a common man in the street. Not a scientific name for exclusive scientific community. Large part of Muslim world are also English speakers and they don't spell Ibn al-Haytham like Alhazen. I am a Pakistani Muslim who went to English language schools all my life and I never heard the word Alhazen until only when I saw it on Wikipedia. Metaphysicswar (talk) 02:12, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Islam— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CAPTAIN RAJU ( ✉ ) 16:04, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Muslim population growth
Please also see WP:BRD.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 20:30, 9 September 2016 (UTC)


 * EvergreenFir, Thank you for the WP:BRD correction, never knew this policy existed. It is hard to find these policies as they are not located in one place. Metaphysicswar (talk) 02:55, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
 --Peace world  09:07, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Social class in the Muslim world for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Social class in the Muslim world is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Social class in the Muslim world until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Steve Quinn (talk) 05:35, 24 September 2016 (UTC)