User talk:Metarhyme

This user's expectations were unreasonable. Bye.

Scott McClellan
"president's plump propaganda minister"  my goodness. What is your name for the new propaganda minister? I am just starting on the Law Project....will have to bury myself in reading all of it! I look forward to contributing.MollyBloom 06:14, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Image:Bombay.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Bombay.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —Fritz S. (Talk) 23:01, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
 * They prefer to be called Mumbai now. Delete away. Metarhyme 18:02, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The skyline shot I uploaded did get deleted; in '08 someone else's upload (a different image) become Bombay.jpg. Metarhyme (talk) 21:29, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Erdal.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Erdal.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:22, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Legal challenges to NSA warrantless searches in the United States
I have nominated Legal challenges to NSA warrantless searches in the United States, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Legal challenges to NSA warrantless searches in the United States. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. THF (talk) 14:53, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for warning me. Suppression of information is important to authority. If there is no interest, the suppression is sustained. - Metarhyme (talk) 21:49, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Erdal.gif
Thank you for uploading File:Erdal.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Admrboltz (talk) 23:35, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Problems with pictures of shoe polish I really don't understand, but it doesn't bother me. Metarhyme (talk) 21:51, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:NewJerseySupremeCourt.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:NewJerseySupremeCourt.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:14, 23 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Thank you for very verbosely explaining how I can avoid offending via uploading possibly useful images. Hopefully, you guys got them all. - Metarhyme (talk) 22:04, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dmitri Alperovitch.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Dmitri Alperovitch.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Better source request for File:John D. (Jay) Rockefeller IV.png
Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia: You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.
 * File:John D. (Jay) Rockefeller IV.png

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:11, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:John D. (Jay) Rockefeller IV.png


The file File:John D. (Jay) Rockefeller IV.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 16 May 2019 (UTC)