User talk:Metlifebee

Speedy deletion nomination of New article template is Good...beta


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on New article template is Good...beta requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Tinton5 (talk) 20:00, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
Hello, I'm Redrose64. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! -- Red rose64 (talk) 15:02, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm GZWDer. An edit that you recently made to Template:Humorous essay seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! GZWDer (talk) 08:16, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Template talk:Humorous essay. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. -- Red rose64 (talk) 15:09, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

I am simply trying to upload a article I considered most humorous. The content portal has supplied me with more wisdom to contact an administrator because of this disabling blocking policy. Redrose64 I have no home talk page. Brandleclawx is a page which has born more than one account talk page. Is this possible and do I am often lose? Is this an example of fairer Wikipedia policy. I don't want to excuse her of her Vandalism or lose any of my privileges. Let's have this dispute reviewed by our administrators first. I'll apologize if I am defeating our Wikipedia.

--Metlifebee (talk) 17:34, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
 * If you want to make editing tests, please use the Sandbox.
 * If you want to create a new article, please see Your first article - you might like to use the article wizard. Please do not overwrite existing pages with material that is substantially different, this is considered disruptive, and may even be vandalism.
 * Regarding "I have no home talk page" - every person who has registered an account has one; its name is the same as your user name, but prefixed "User talk:". So, my home talk page is User talk:Redrose64; that of Brambleclawx is User talk:Brambleclawx; and so yours is User talk:Metlifebee - which is this page. -- Red rose64 (talk) 17:57, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Template talk:Humorous essay, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Red rose64 (talk) 21:05, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

December 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=586310723 your edit] to Interpolation (manuscripts) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:13, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
 * An interpolation, in relation to [Limitations]  and especially ancient manuscripts, is an entry or passage in a text that was not written by

Speedy deletion nomination of Christian prayer: sinner's Prayer


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. red dog six (talk) 04:13, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

I'm am also new to the blacklist and reserve the contest to ask more questions on how to publish my template as created for the category Christian Prayer:sinner's prayer. Would you be kind to email more information? I can assure you I have tried searching for the permalink which allows me to list my section #. Anyway b/metlifebee/.com should be the username which will help me with a url shortener that I still approve as effective.

--Metlifebee (talk) 04:49, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Please stop using talk pages such as Talk:Main Page for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article; not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:17, 18 December 2013 (UTC)