User talk:MetroDreams

bg:voz
Hello.

Would you please WP:CITE the information that bg:voz is "first phase of metro and includes two underground stations that were build for metro earlier." As far as I know, those are simply local lines of regular railway, which are not planned as a "first phase of metro", and the underground stations were not "built for the metro earlier". Comparison with S-bahn is possible, but 1) it is still a long stretch from being one 2) as far as I know, a proper U-bahn is planned for Belgrade, and these stations were not part of that. So, the section you added is rather misleading. No such user (talk) 07:54, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Zagreb Metro
It's apparent that you like to have "metro dreams" :) but an encyclopedia is not a place for dreams; it describes the facts as they are, it doesn't prescribe or predict anything. Please read WP:CRYSTALBALL. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 15:30, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
 * As your nick express a pleasure from Wiki, my nick mirrores my life skill only:) Info in srticles must estimates according to Wiki rulers and practice. Info about Z.metro as large section in article about existed Z.transports no appropriable. Detailed info of history of question must be in separate article. And this article has many quoted sources. Like Wiki articles about thousands of other proposed projects and due to long consensus confirmed by many editors this article must exist. MetroDreams (talk) 05:46, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jinan Metro, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2000s (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikilinking
Hi, and thanks for your work on the English Wikipedia.

I noticed an article you worked on. Just a short note to point out that we don’t normally link:
 * dates
 * years
 * commonly known geographical terms (including well-known country-names), and
 * common terms you’d look up in a dictionary (unless significantly technical).

This even applies for infoboxes.

Thanks and my best wishes.

Tony  (talk)  09:31, 14 January 2014 (UTC)