User talk:Metta Bubble/ archive1

Please don't leave
I'm disappointed that you've taken the decision to leave the project, and although I respect it, would like to ask you to reconsider. You're letting trolls like Resid win. NSL E (T+C)(seen this?) at 02:20 UTC (2006-04-10)
 * That would be most unfortunate for you to leave. Please stay... Netscott 05:51, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I'd be sorry to see you go. Please stay around and help improve wikipedia. Your contributions have been valuable. ---=-C-=- 05:59, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Under other circumstances, I would continue to cordially but firmly explain why I think your reaction to my block was a simple misunderstanding, but it seems that when I've done so in the past it has only resulted in you becoming more upset, which is not what I'm after. I will respond to one comment you made about how I "didn't bother" responding: unfortunately, Wikipedia was down for en extended period of time earlier today, and I had no chance to do so. As well, this all transpired within 24 hours, and I've been busy at work besides Wikipedia. Anyway, I simply want to make sure I tell you that I am not driving you off Wikipedia, and I have no desire at all to see you leave. I hope you reconsider. :-( Dmcdevit·t 06:42, 10 April 2006 (UTC)


 * I second NSLE's, Netscott's, and Dmcdevit's pleas for you to stay, Metta Bubble. I understand your frustration with the system.  I'm frustrated with it too from time to time, and also feel like throwing in the towel... especially with so many unnecessary confrontations being quite common on Wikipedia.  But you should know your contributions are valued and if/when you choose to come back you will be welcome.  -- noosphere 05:42, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Gnostic Movement
I have some overall concerns about this article. Primarily the notablity of the subject matter. There are very few links from other sites to the external references, and often the primary links are only to each other. I am eliciting comments since you have edited on this page. See my comments on the talk page. Trödel 23:01, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

AMA Roll Call
There is currently an AMA Roll Call going on. Please visit the page and sign next to your name to indicate whether or not you're still active. :-) ??? Steve Caruso ( desk / poll ) 18:38, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Proposal to merge Stephen Barrett, Quackwatch, and NCAHF article
I have started three separate proposals to merge these three articles. The discussion for each amalgamation of the merge begins here. I would appreciate you taking the time to give your thoughts for each proposal. Thanks. Levine2112 00:52, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Regarding Association of Members' Advocates
Hi, you are receiving this message because you have listed yourself as an active member of WP:AMA. If you aren't currently accepting inquiries for AMA, or if you have resigned, please de-list yourself from AMA Members. If you are still active, please consider tending to any new requests that may appear on Category:AMA Requests for Assistance. We're going to put AMA on wheels. :) Sorry for the template spamming - we're just trying to update our records, after we had a huge backlog earlier in the week (if you've been taking cases, then sorry, and please ignore this :)). Again, sorry, and thanks! M a  rtinp23  21:22, 22 October 2006 (UTC)