User talk:Mewis88

Hey You Guys

Sorry no more messing around then : And btw you never keep a darren stride page do ya!

File:Stridey.jpeg
Hi I noticed you said you had gained permission from burton albion to use this image. Unfortunately, the proper channel to do this is via WP:OTRS. In short they must email wikipedia saying they give permission. --DFS454 (talk) 19:17, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Here's a template you may want to use
To permissions@wikimedia.org

I hereby assert that I am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of WORK [ insert link ].

I agree to publish that work under the free license LICENSE [ choose at least one from ttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Text_of_the_GFDL. ].

I acknowledge that I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product, and to modify it according to their needs, as long as they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.

I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be attributed to me.

I am aware that the free license only concerns copyright, and I reserve the option to take action against anyone who uses this work in a libelous way, or in violation of personality rights, trademark restrictions, etc.

I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the work may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project. DATE, NAME OF THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER

Speedy deletion nomination of Jamie boast
A tag has been placed on Jamie boast requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 12:58, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

July 2010
This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you create an inappropriate page, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 12:58, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism, as you did to Battle of Waterloo, will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice. Barret (talk) 13:30, 20 July 2010 (UTC)