User talk:Mewnst

A cookie for you!

 * Thanks meow!Mewnst (talk) 20:02, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: RM Broadcasting (January 22)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bkissin was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:RM Broadcasting and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:RM Broadcasting, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:RM_Broadcasting Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bkissin&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:RM_Broadcasting reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bkissin (talk) 16:06, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:RM Broadcasting


Hello, Mewnst. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "RM Broadcasting".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:39, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

}}

Blanking Bored Ape Yacht Club
hi @Mewnst! I noticed that you had recently blanked the Bored Ape Yacht Club article. This led me to wonder: can you share what contributed to you making that change?

I ask the above with the following thoughts in mind:


 * The edit summary you provided when blanking the article leads me to think you saw it as being "promotional" and "not notable."
 * I understand Bored Ape Yacht Club to be notable considering that it has been subject to, "...significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject." See coverage in: The New Yorker, Rolling Stone, New York Times, and Reuters.
 * I understood the article at the time of being blanked to not be promotional considering it was written in, what I perceive to be, "...an objective and unbiased style, free of puffery."
 * I was surprised that you blanked the article without starting a conversation on the talk page considering there were three other, relatively experienced people (@ThadeusOfNazereth, @David Gerard, and myself), who had contributed to the article.

Stussll (talk) 05:57, 10 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Arguably it was pretty thin on notability, and its present redirection is fine by me - David Gerard (talk) 09:02, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
 * A Google search on my end turns up quite a bit of coverage, so I think the topic itself is definitely notable - That's why I only marked it as needing references improved. That said, it's not my wheelhouse and, given my biases, I don't trust myself to put together a quality article - Hopefully somebody else is able to put together an expanded version of the article (maybe you, @Stussll?). A redirect probably works fine until a draft makes the rounds, though. ThadeusOfNazerethTalk to Me! 11:31, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I concur - David Gerard (talk) 17:02, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Hopefully somebody else is able to put together an expanded version of the article (maybe you, @Stussll?). A redirect probably works fine until a draft makes the rounds, though.
 * What you are describing above seems like a good course of action to me, @ThadeusOfNazereth!
 * I've moved the article to my sandbox to expand. Once I think it's in a good enough place to be considered for being published at Bored Ape Yacht Club what do y'all suggest I do? One thought: I could start a conversation on User_talk:Stussll/Sandbox alerting y'all that I think the article is in a state to be reviewed? Stussll (talk) 02:23, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I was a little too excited to purge it - building up a draft is definitely worthwhile. I didn't share any talk page discussion on the matter, as there wasn't yet a talk page made, and (to me) that confirmed that the subject was not notable. Sorry for the mistake. Mewnst (talk) 18:08, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
 * You sharing the thinking that went into blanking the page is helpful context – I appreciate you sharing it, @Mewnst ^ _ ^
 * And no worries at all. I'm glad we seemed to have converged on a path forward... Stussll (talk) 02:24, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

NFT
Yes, they arent memes but they got their popularity from memes about them. NFT got popular because of memes mostly from the monkey art. I added the category because they got popular because of memes made from them. HelpingWorld (talk) 22:33, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Fair :) Mewnst (talk) 04:07, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Mewnst

Thank you for creating Empire of Illusion.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 13:22, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Cleo Wright
I noticed you wrote a person had been disemboweled, then completely recovered. I question the veracity of that source. Did someone really recover from having their guts ripped out? — Jacona (talk) 10:45, 7 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Howdy! Thanks for bringing this up, I partially misrepresented the documentation. My source for that was Capeci's The Lynching of Cleo Wright, page 16, which includes an excerpt:
 * "Dr. M.G. Anderson sewed her three fingers and closed a six-inch abdominal slash that had punctured her large bowel. More critical than these wounds or the loss of one and a half quarts of blood, however, was the life-threatening infection that followed."
 * "Disemboweled" is not used and is not an accurate way to describe Sturgeon's injuries. On page 72, however, Capeci wrote that "her intestines spilled out" from the altercation with her assailant. Capeci indulged in some exaggeration, likely because Sturgeon's documented experiences were partially informed by Capeci's direct interviews with Sturgeon herself. I do think it is still very important to use Capeci's work as a reference in this page, as no other source is as thorough and Capeci is a proper historian. I should get on to properly sourcing other content I wrote into the page as well. Mewnst (talk) 00:29, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

 * You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. 

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)