User talk:Mexxxicano

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Infrogmation 00:03, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Mexico
I reverted the edits you made to mexico. Can you explain why you removed the crime section? Sifaka  talk  05:48, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
 * That section is pretty non-NPOV looking... though. I see why you deleted it, but perhaps you can use an edit summary next time? Sifaka   talk  05:50, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

I've just reverted your removal of the section mentioning the Zimmerman Telegram, you removed it without comment, and I'm not sure why as you diddn't make an edit summary, or make a comment on the talk page. The telegram certainly existed, although possible it might be more relvant in another article. David Underdown 12:40, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

How to contact the blocking administrator
The reasons for the block are documented on the user page. If you did not commit the vandalism documented in the supporting evidence, you may wish to discuss this with the blocking administrator.

If you are the owner of this Wikipedia user account and wish to discuss the reasons for the block, you can contact the blocking administrator by via email or by posting on your talk page.

--Richard 15:58, 22 May 2006 (UTC)


 * yeah, thanks i already send an email, i expect the answer from drini, i didnt try to change the text of mexico. (unsigned, apparently from User:Mexxxicano.


 * Please read the conversation that I had with User:Drini on his talk page. I think your account may be getting hijacked by people who are using it to commit vandalism.  Click on the "my contributions" tab to see what edits are being logged to your account.  Good luck.


 * --Richard 16:39, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Mexico
Oh! Thanks for bringing the vandalism to my attention. I have replaced it with the correct photo. - Mike Rosoft 07:59, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

lol no problem


 * I understand your comments. I invite you to come again and edit the article. Bring plenty of sources, good will, and heart for discussion. I will personally stop any attempt to reduce the quality of the article, made by those users you menctioned or anyone else. Hari Seldon 05:52, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Mexxxicano, here are a few links supporting your claim regarding Mexico and science....

http://www1.oecd.org/publications/e-book/92-2003-04-1-7294/PDF%5CA63.pdf

http://www.jornada.unam.mx/2007/01/18/index.php?section=sociedad&article=045n1soc

http://www.jornada.unam.mx/2007/01/20/index.php?section=sociedad&article=038n3soc

Mexxxicano, I'd really appreciate it if you could remove the "socialist" tendencies label by the PRD party, on the same page. The PRD isn't anymore "socialist" than the Democratic Party in the US. Just becausee FoxNews and the PAN label something does not make it true. I would make the changes myself, but, for whatever reasons, you need to be registered. Thanks. 69.210.244.63 01:13, 31 January 2007 (UTC)]

Reversion of your comment on "Crime and poverty" on Talk:Mexico page
You reverted your comment about "Crime and poverty". Why? I don't agree with what you wrote but I didn't see any reason why you would delete it. --Richard 03:01, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * ok, i will add it again, but what are you gonna do with the section about culture? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mexxxicano (talk • contribs)


 * I will eventually do the reorganization of the culture-related sections that I described on Talk:Mexico. I've been waiting to see if anybody objects.


 * Regarding "Crime and poverty"... I respectfully disagree. I fully respect your right to say what you wrote.  Many people have beliefs along those lines.  I don't.


 * Me personally, I don't think poverty is the root cause of crime. It may be that certain kinds of crime are more prevalent among poor people but maybe that's because rich people are better equipped to commit crime non-violently and also better equipped to escape capture and/or punishment.


 * I believe that most poor people are honest and therefore poverty does not cause crime. I think poverty creates an environment where crime can happen but criminals are criminals because they want to be not because they are poor.  I think it is a myth to say that poor people become criminals because they are poor.


 * I think external conditions such as drugs, urban gang culture, etc. are a major influence on people becoming criminals. Admittedly, it is harder to resist these influences when you are poor.  However, poverty does not by itself cause crime.


 * Look at the Crime in Mexico article. There is hardly a word about poverty in it.  You may think that's wrong.  That's your right.  However, I hope you will recognize that there is more than one philosophical opinion about the nature and causes of crime in poor areas.


 * --Richard 03:18, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

ok, i would like to see the changes in culture section, good work in crime of mexico by the way.

--Mexxxicano

Economy of Mexico
Sorry, I forgot about it. I just changed it to 4.8% thanks for reminding me. -- the D únadan 02:22, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Comment
Would you please comment on the article North America (Americas)? I created this article and it is nominated for deletion. If you want to vote for deletion, vote Delete. If you want to keep this article, vote Keep. Vote hereAlexCovarrubias ( Let's talk! ) 17:26, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

North America (Americas) delete review
Thanks for voting and expressing your opinion about the article North America (Americas). As you know the debate was closed, and the result was "to delete it". Since I, as the creator of the article, thought the decision was hasty and wrong, I opened a |process to review the deletion.

This mean that administrators and regular editors can vote again and, most importantly, argument why the decision was wrong or right. Please, take a look at this and express your opinion:


 * North America (Americas), deletion review

Thanks for your time reading this message. AlexCovarrubias ( Let's talk! ) 23:00, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Twilight Zone
On the talk page of one of the episodes of the Twilight Zone (namely, Living Doll), there is a comment which is attributed to you, which is odd because I made that comment (though I didn't sign and I had no account at the time). Not that I'm upset, but how did that happen? James Jonathan