User talk:Mfcmaster

Fair use rationale for File:Easy Computer Sync.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Easy Computer Sync.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:13, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Easy Computer Sync


The article Easy Computer Sync has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Page isn't written from a neutral point of view: see WP:NPOV. That would be fine, except that the page also seems to fail WP:GNG. The sources it cites to establish notability aren't secondary sources. And information about who picked up a press release about the subject doesn't help to establish notability either; press releases aren't independent of the subject, and anyway, that reference now points to a dead link. See also the essay WP:NSOFT for some interesting side points.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Unforgettableid (talk) 03:40, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Easy Computer Sync


A tag has been placed on Easy Computer Sync, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. TheMesquito (talk) 23:36, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

January 2013
Hello, I'm Unforgettableid. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Easy Computer Sync seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ''Note that, after I edited the article to be more encyclopedic, I thought the article was fine. You have now made the article unencyclopedic again. I am now monitoring the page. Thank you.'' Unforgettableid (talk) 02:39, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Mfcmaster. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Easy Computer Sync, you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Unforgettableid (talk) 21:14, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Mfcmaster, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please remember to disclose these connections. Unforgettableid (talk) 19:52, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Easy Computer Sync has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. If an edit makes multiple types of changes to an article, describe each and every one of the types of changes in your edit summary. If an edit is a revert, describe it as such. Users who use inaccurate or inappropriate edit summaries may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Unforgettableid (talk) 19:57, 14 January 2013 (UTC)