User talk:Mfield/Archive 6

Luigi
Hi, Mfield. How are we supposed to find a username like that in a search? He fingermashed five or six numbers at the end. - Hoops gza (talk) 03:51, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
 * With copy and paste? Do you really type every username you come across out in full when you need to search it? Sooner or later, Wikipedia will run out of type-able/memorable usernames. There's a difference between complicated and deliberately confusing. Mfield (Oi!) 03:55, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Oxford Summer Courses
I don't mean to judge your decision to G11 the article, but I have restored it and removed the only part that could be considered promotional. The rest seems neutral and factual. You are, of course, more than welcome to take it to AfD if you do not believe it meets our criteria for inclusion. ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  10:10, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Edit summaries
You are reverting my edits and telling me to use edit summaries. I am using edit summaries and you are not explaining your reverts. I have again restored my edit. If you're using automated tools, I encourage you to review what you're actually doing. Ponydepression (talk) 14:47, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Guess who's back
64.183.48.206 is back from his one month ban and is making the same unsourced edits that got him blocked. I am starting to think he is some kind of sociopath. I warned him, but to no avail. Can he blocked again and can it be for longer than a month? Bob Caldwell CSL (talk) 18:36, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Indefinitely WP:Semi-protect the Sexual orientation, Bisexuality and Pansexuality articles?
Hello, Mfield. I have a request: Will you indefinitely WP:Semi-protect the Sexual orientation and Bisexuality articles, and perhaps the Pansexuality article, for the same reason that you indefinitely WP:Semi-protected Template:Bisexuality topics? These three articles are commonly rife with problematic editing, and the first two need to consistently be WP:Semi-protected; the Bisexuality article's WP:Semi-protection expired yesterday. The Homosexuality article is indefinitely WP:Semi-protected for similar reasons, though it would obviously get significantly more WP:Vandalism and other problematic editing than the Sexual orientation, Bisexuality and Pansexuality articles if it was unproteced. I would also request that you WP:Semi-protect the Heterosexuality article, but it usually does not have problematic editing.

On a side note: I currently have your talk page WP:Watchlisted, so there is no need to ping me via WP:Echo back here to your talk page or reply at my talk page. I'd rather you reply here at your talk page to keep the discussion from being disjointed. Looking at your talk page history, it's apparent that you usually reply here at your talk page anyway. Flyer22 (talk) 07:23, 10 December 2014 (UTC)


 * On Wikipedia, I usually move right on when I'm ignored (though I remember that I was ignored). But do you mind explaining why you think that an article like Pansexuality, which mostly gets WP:Vandalism edits or WP:Disruptive edits (look at its recent edit history, for example), should not be indefinitely WP:Semi-protected? That WP:Pending changes protection, if one can call that protection, is poor. And it's only a matter of time before problems start popping back up at the Sexual orientation and Bisexuality articles, especially the Bisexuality article, with well-meaning but disruptive edits such as these that I recently reverted being among the additions. Flyer22 (talk) 20:14, 19 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Looking at the history I agree, I have semi-protected it for 3 months. We'll see how that works for now. Mfield (Oi!) 04:42, 30 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Thank you. I suppose the others don't yet warrant re-protection, and I can understand that. Flyer22 (talk) 05:09, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Joe Warfield
Hello, I'm curious about the circumstances regarding the deleted image for Joe Warfield (Nov 15th, 2014). I uploaded the image in June 2008 and included a free-use statement and permission at that time. The image has been up for over 6 years. I don't see an edit under the history that would have removed the permission. Could the permission be removed separately from the image? Any input would be helpful.

Thank you, ~Thomas

File:Joe Warfield, Oct 2006.png (F11: No evidence of permission for more than 7 days) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.77.35.92 (talk) 22:07, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I have looked at the history prior to deletion, and the original licensing claim. The issue is that you did not take the the image, the image was taken by Adrienne, who as such is the copyright holder. Whatever may have been said at the time is unfortunately irrelevant. Verbal permission is not adequate, the image needs to be explicitly released by the copyright holder under a suitably unrestrictive license for it to be uploaded to Wikipedia. If that is still possible then the normal method of doing so is via an OTRS ticket. Mfield (Oi!) 04:52, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Lingaa
Hi Mfield, The protected article page of Lingaa has incorrect reporting on the box office collections. I have written in the talk page with an updated source. It has however been ignored. Could I seek your assistance in looking into this? Many thanks in advance. Audit Guy (talk) 02:55, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Hello Mfield, not sure I've had the pleasure before. Would you mind if I lowered Lingaa to semi-protection? It seems that most of the vandalism was coming from non-autoconfirmed users, so I think semi-protection should still catch the majority of the vandalism. Best — Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 07:31, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Yeah sure, go ahead - that will likely be sufficient now the immediate issue has passed. Mfield (Oi!) 16:06, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I'll go and do that now. — Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 16:13, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi Mfield, please unprotect the page Lingaa because many people can't edit the page. Thank you.(User talk:Amarnath Da Vinci) 11:37, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Image for an article.
Dear Sir ! I am trying to publish an image of mangoes "Anwar Ratol" in the article "List of mangoes cultivators" but no success. The image is made by my friend and he has authorized to use it in the article. Please help me do this. I appreciate for your time.

Delist and replace for Pittsburgh panorama
Hi Mfield, I took a new panorama of Pittsburgh and have proposed a delist and replace of your featured picture. Your opinion on the delist and replace discussion page would be appreciated. dllu (t,c) 07:24, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

This Thursday: Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Getty Center
You are invited to join the Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Getty Center in LA on October 15! (drop-in any time, 10am-4pm)--Pharos (talk) 18:25, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

JonTron
As a page relating to JonTron as been accepted, could you set a redirect from JonTron and Jon_Jafari to JonTron_(Web_Series)? Max Isaac 21:54, 24 October 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by IsaacMax (talk • contribs)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 25 January 2016 (UTC)