User talk:Mfredturner

Deborah Rogers
I am sorry, but your additions to Deborah Rogers' article, from the perspective of Wikipedia, count as original research. X told me something is true, is insufficient for this website, as you will find in the linked article. As I tried to explain on the article's talk page, the test for additions to any page is verifuability rather than truth. If you have any published third-party reliable sources indicating the assertions you have made in your edits, you are welcome to add them.

Wikipedia editors are unable to distinguish between people who are making genuine claims or imposters. You may have the connections you have claimed, but editors' have no means of confirming this as being true. Please contact Wikipedia directly if you wish to take this issue further. Philip Cross (talk) 15:44, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for clearing this up. Sadly, the information you assert is verified, is not actually accurate. I would in this instance consider it pertinent to remove the information, rather than make false claims, 'verified' by misinformation. The veracity of third-party source herein cited is only justified by their assertion of such fact in the public domain.