User talk:Mgordier/Evaluate an Article

I found a few problematic aspects in the article. First, I am not sure what the author meant with the use of "viable" in the article. Useable? Practical? Neither of these senses really work in this case for the concept of preservation metadata. An issue of the article that I feel needs updating is the section titled "Current Developments in Preservation Metadata" since most of what is included are not recent developments. Most date to several decades ago. The only one that is a recent addition is ARCHANGEL, the blockchain technology. The uneven treatment of the various entries in this section should be remedied, too. Odd to see that someone made comments on how to make the article better on the talk page, and then did not take the time to fix the issues.--JBeaudoin (talk) 01:01, 11 October 2021 (UTC)