User talk:Mgradel

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! -FisherQueen (Talk) 23:46, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

"we are church"
A template has been added to the article "we are church", suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -FisherQueen (Talk) 23:46, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

On removed proposed deletion template
Are you sure that the article makes it fully clear how the organization meets the notability guideline, and is adequately sourced by that guideline? Because the step after the removal of the proposed deletion template is immediately being submitted for review to Articles for Deletion- by your removal of the template, I'm assuming that you've read the guidelines and are confident that this subject will pass a community review to verify that it meets them. -FisherQueen (Talk) 00:04, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your comments. I do think that this very notable group is certainly worthy of inclusion. Unfortunately, as I was trying to respond to your comments, someone else "speedily deleted" my nascent article. I dont know the relevant sources well enough to write a full article about this without considerable research, but will try to add it to list of subjects that should be included. Thanks again. --Mgradel 13:43, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

VotF
Welcome to WP, and great content work on that page. I mentioned an issue with the sources on its talk page that need to be addressed, so feel free to jump back in. Baccyak4H (Yak!) 02:19, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

thanks, I was wondering about that problem w NYT. I think that most could be replaced with equivalent sources from Boston Globe, which is free. I'll work on that when I have a chance.--Mgradel 13:27, 17 July 2007 (UTC)