User talk:Mgsports

May 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Dhenkanal district, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Do not replace cited material with uncited material. Allens (talk &#124; contribs) 07:15, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Dhenkanal (princely state), without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. ''One reference, while helpful - thanks! - is not sufficient to remove a "further references needed" tag, considering the general lack of references on the page.'' Allens (talk &#124; contribs) 13:12, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Dhenkanal (princely state). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.  Neil N   talk to me  13:37, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Dhenkanal district, you may be blocked from editing.  Neil N   talk to me  14:45, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Dhenkanal district, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  Neil N   talk to me  17:04, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Reg. edits on Dhenkanal district page on "Most Prominent Persons"
Hi,Can you please stop with the deletes and explain the rationale behind that. Also you insert the names of "Samant Surya Narayan Patnaik", "Prasanna Kumar Patnaik" and "Jitendra Kumar Patnaik", so can you explain or provide any reference about why they should be listed there. Thanks, --Karan1974 (talk) 17:10, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Dhenkanal district shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Please note that any further removal of the content without getting consensus for the removal will likely result in a block.  Neil N   talk to me  17:16, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

== By now I have enough knowledge about the so called EDITORS and their seniors like one NeilN. Enough is enough. We once had high impression of WIKI Organization and today we know that it is a gang of RIFF RAFFs. I donot care to edit nor do I care to visit your sites, because I do not have any faith left... Love.==Mgsports (talk) 06:11, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User:Karan1974. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  Neil N   talk to me  12:31, 9 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Read my Talk on Dhenkanal,India page. 1.SMT. SULAKSHANA DEVI, first lady poet of Orissa should be flashed. 2. Soparno Satpathy is a NON ENTITY and not a Prominent Person of Dhenkanal(there might be some defect in your system where fraudulent entries come). 3.NANDINI SATPATHY belongs to a village near Puri, 160 KMs from Dhenkanal. She is not a Prominent Person from Dhenkanal... Sorry, you are finding fault with my editing, but are unable to catch frauds. I am not an Indian, but I know enough.PLEASE REPLY..


 * Your "enough knowledge" certainly needs more than enough enough's to come to the level of Senior Editors. "Enough" is a word that certainly does not apply to you positively but applies in other sense. You put across your opinions, beliefs and passionate claims, and are under the delusion that they are the "FACTS". Seems that is not good for anybody. You mention that you are "not an Indian, but I know enough".... how come ? what are the sources of your statements and what do you know enough of Ms. Nandini Satapathy that as per you she is not a prominent person from Dhenkanal, but she was prominent enough to be a Member of the Legislative Assembly, elected by the local populace from that place for 3 tenures. Twisted logic by your "enough knowledge" standards. The message you left on my user page, which was subsequently deleted by NeilN, totally describes the kind of individual you really are (unemployed, useless, unfit and if I may add, lack of basic grounding and unable to comprehend facts) and mercifully not me. Thanks.--Karan1974 (talk) 21:31, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Message left on my user page by user Mgsports on May 11, 2012 and my response
Mgsports wrote "I read a message from you, in my Talk page. Accusations and counters apart, the topic of discussion was some concrete points as regards correctness of WIKI entries. After all the fact finding and analysis, the fellows who decide WIKI Pages contents will put in ideas of their choice. I donot mind whether WIKI enters data provided by you or by me. Whatever be my source, Nandini belongs to Puri district, worked in Cuttack, Bhubaneswar and briefly at New Delhi are facts. WIKI seniors are Americans unaware of much of India. You cannot misguide Indians and Britishers. I love you inspite of your bad English and bad manners. You are born in free India, free to behave as you like.05:59, 11 May 2012 (UTC)Mgsports (talk)"


 * User Mgsports, could you please stop cluttering up my user page with hate/ irrelevant messages. In all fairness, you started it and I only responded with "your" choice of words that you had for me. Senior editors in wiki have earned their seniority because of the contributions they have made; contributions which are verifiable and factual. They don't exhibit mercurial temperament and don't impose their personal beliefs. And not all of them are Americans; there are many senior editors of different nationalities. As any ethical editor would do, they would look at actual and verifiable evidence. The last time I searched for Ms. Nandini, she was born in Cuttack and not Puri. I am not sure where you got the idea that she was born in Puri. I can quote many websites where it is reflected and none of them state Puri. Even the state government site of Puri does not list her as one of the prominent persons. It is not "Whatever be my source", it is "What is your source?" and "How reliable are the sources?". I am not misguiding anybody for your kind information and I am only citing what are factual. I did not create the list, various people contributed and I was able to verify that it is correct. I have put in my effort to screen out inconsequential people, provided additional information towards justifying why the listed people are notable. Towards the discussion, I have provided appropriate references that are also verifiable. The list is not a comprehensive list and notable people can be added. Can you please stop kidding now... I have bad English and even bad manners... What can I say... I am trying to have a civil discussion and please don't get me started. Thanks.--Karan1974 (talk) 07:07, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Deletion of discussions from the talk pages of the article of Dhenkanal district and Dhenkanal, India
Hi Mgsports, You completely blanked out the series of discussions that have happened till date. This is totally uncalled for. Please refrain from deleting the discussions from the article talk pages. Thanks. --Karan1974 (talk) 07:20, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Dhenkanal district. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  Neil N   talk to me  15:13, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

In response to your feedback
Hi Mgsports, can you explain me why you think that on my talk page, thanks.

Webclient101 (talk) 17:39, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

&#160;
 * Attention Webclient101:== I will definitely try to explain, only if you can understand what I say. Editing a great site like yours is a difficult job which should be assigned to highly knowledgeable persons of great insight into ancient and medieval history, political development world over and sufficient knowledge of local conditions. Then of course reference of books and periodicals are a requirement. Unfotunately some editors I came across enter material without proper verification(maybe they want to highlight the names of their relatives, I am not sure though). If you try to correct them, they use very foul language, not to be used by any gentleman or lady. Such editors behave like shallow brainless street fighters who take to editing with some ulterior motive. I have further observed that some elements who behave like seniors to such editors also show similar temperament. Their presence definitely goes against the interest of WIKI. Can you delete the entire list of NOTABLE PERSONS of Dhenkanal District Page ? I would love to see that, because some people shown as NOTABLE are notable in the wrong sense.==Mgsports (talk) 14:01, 23 November 2012 (UTC)