User talk:Mguvendiren

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits, such as the ones to the page 2011 Turkish sports corruption scandal, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the "sandbox" rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write   below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia. I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! LardoBalsamico (talk) 03:02, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

When Freedom of Speach become Vandalizm
Trying to correct the information in "Turkish Soccer Corruption". But Galatasaray holigans are keep warning me that I am vandalizing the page. Puh !!!

Fact 1: Galatasaray is also involved in match fixing.

On 3 March 2012, another scandal broke involving Galatasaray SK in the match fixing case, when a letter written by Bülent Tulun (former sport director) to former Galatasaray President Adnan Polat was revealed. In this letter, Tulun was asking the whereabouts of missing 1 million dollars to Polat, as follows: "Dear president, you were talking about me granting 75,000 dollars for myself from Ilic (former GS player)'s contract. Everything was done for the favor of GS. I hope 1,5 million your driver took from the club was also used in the favor of the club. I do have the receipt of the following transaction.". Immediately after this, prosecutors started an investigation on former president Adnan Polat, Mustafa Kabasakal (driver) and former sports director Bülent Tulun. . Although the club reported this transaction as a payment for former player Song, they were not able to prove it. The allegations against Galatasaray, however, are based on the 2005-06 football season. A relegation-battling Denizlispor surprisingly held then-leader Fenerbahçe to a 1-1 draw, allowing Galatasaray to win the title.

Fact 2: There is no match fixing in Basketball. Do not try to extend the issue.

Fact 3: Fenerbahce fans are angry and upset about TFF not protecting their rights and banning the team from Champions League. Not for corrusption or relegation etc issues.

Fact 4: 50000 GS fans march the streets. Really. It was only 5000.

2011 Turkish Sports Corruption Scandal
Please do not revert the article.

All of them are based on the sources. Here are the sources: 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. If you have any source related to basketball investigation, do please add. If not, do not delete anything based on sources. Thanks. LardoBalsamico (talk) 15:03, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

I did delete Galatasaray SK section. Because it' s related to 2005-2006 season of Turkish Super League. You can start a new article regarding this, it' s acceptable. For example 2006 Italian football scandal and 2011–12 Italian football scandal. Can you see the difference? The years are important. You can also check the template regarding this. Here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Sports_Corruption_Scandals. Thanks.LardoBalsamico (talk) 15:31, 1 June 2012 (UTC) I also removed the year 2008 period. So please do not add 2005-2006 years into the article. Thank you. LardoBalsamico (talk) 15:39, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:10, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Discuss issues with articles; do not keep making the same edits over and over
Your recent editing history at 2011 Turkish sports corruption scandal shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. —C.Fred (talk) 15:34, 1 June 2012 (UTC)


 * I already started a dispute for this page, and wrote to the editors talk page. I am trying be constructive and fair here. But my edits are keep deleted by the LardoBalsamico. So please stop threatening me. (talk) 15:41, 1 June 2012 (UTC)


 * And discussing the issue—preferably at the article talk page first, but if necessary, through dispute resolution—is good. However, that is not an excuse for you to keep edit warring in the article.


 * WP:3RR is a bright-line rule: if an editor violates it, it is ground for a block. There are very limited exceptions, such as reverting vandalism. However, none of the edits I've seen to 2011 Turkish sports corruption scandal are vandalism. —C.Fred (talk) 15:43, 1 June 2012 (UTC)