User talk:Mhayes3

Welcome!
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia!

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 02:12, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Mary Wiseman's date of birth
What is the source of the date you added? DGtal (talk) 20:37, 9 December 2017 (UTC) DGtal (talk) 20:37, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

R44 (New York City Subway car)
Can you please stop with your disruptive editing on that article? If you see inaccurate information in terms of how many cars are in service or where they serve, do not change it directly on the article, but fix it on Template:NYCS const instead. If you do not know how to fix it there, ask someone from WikiProject New York City Public Transportation to fix it for you, thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.198.184.12 (talk) 17:57, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

2755
2755 hasn't been restored yet. Stop edit warring for false information!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.223.164.130 (talk) 02:28, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --64.223.164.130 (talk) 03:52, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Boeing F/A-18E/F Super Hornet date changes
Hello, I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Boeing F/A-18E/F Super Hornet, but you didn't provide a reliable source. The sourced content has been restored. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial. Check the sources cited first before changing sourced content. -Fnlayson (talk) 20:38, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

June 2019
Your recent editing history at Boeing F/A-18E/F Super Hornet shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. McSly (talk) 23:31, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

July 2019
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. McSly (talk) 02:29, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
Your recent editing history at Boeing F/A-18E/F Super Hornet shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. (Hohum @ ) 19:25, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

September 2019
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Boeing C-40 Clipper, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Archer1234 (talk) 03:08, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Boeing 757. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. ''This is at least the second time you have changed the image without first discussing it on the talk page as the comment in the text asks. Please open a discussion on the talk page about changing the image. You may very well get consensus for your proposed change.'' Archer1234 (talk) 04:42, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

R44 Total Count
You have in several instances undone edits stating that 62 R44s remain in service on SIR, as opposed to 63. At least it is agreed that car 402 is gone. However, many recent images, including this one uploaded directly to Wikipedia with EXIF data indicating a recent time stamp, show that car 466 is also not returning to service any time soon. Please refrain from undoing such edits. If you choose to do so, at least leave a reason for why you are undoing edits stating that 62 cars remain. Mtattrain (talk) 02:18, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Image change on aircraft articles
Hello. As I'm sure you noticed, the main image changes you made on multiple aircraft articles have been reverted. To change the main image, it is customary to discuss the change first on the talk page of the article and gain consensus first. If you don't, your changes will be reverted. For example you tried to change the image on the Boeing F/A-18E/F Super Hornet article 4 times. And 4 times it was reverted. So continuing to do so is at best counterproductive and at worst will be interpreted as edit warring which will likely get you blocked from editing. I'm sure you'll understand that the best option is to use the talk page. Thank you --McSly (talk) 01:47, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
 * See Talk:Boeing_777 for a current example of such process. --McSly (talk) 02:25, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

October 2019
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your image was inserted successfully on the page Assault Amphibious Vehicle, but because it appeared to be irrelevant to the article or violated the image use policy, it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Zimmer16 (talk) 19:03, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

November 2019
Your recent editing history at M16 rifle shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. (Hohum @ ) 19:03, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

February 2020
Your recent editing history at Boeing F/A-18E/F Super Hornet shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''You need to discuss the image change on the talk page. If you change that image again without getting consensus first. I will ask for your account to be blocked'' McSly (talk) 14:54, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Staten Island University Hospital does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. ''I have reverted your entire edit because you did not explain what was wrong with the edits. Please use an edit summary next time.'' epicgenius (talk) 00:57, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent you from persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- ferret (talk) 01:10, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
Hello, I'm Oknazevad. An edit that you recently made to Uniforms of the United States Navy seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks!. Please stop trying and failing to change the image when you don't know how it works. oknazevad (talk) 15:42, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:02, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

June 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ford Expedition, you may be blocked from editing. Replacing good-quality images with lower-quality images is a form of vandalism. --Sable232 (talk) 21:49, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)