User talk:Mhrdreader

August 2010
Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Satish Jha. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Wuh Wuz  Dat  21:42, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

I saw that currently the issues Satish Jha is associated with is in the eye of the storm and used only "reliable" sources to the extent they are published sources we rely on. Going by the links you provided, they seemed just fine. Do you have anything specific in mind?

Why would you undo all the work I did? What was UNRELIABLE about it?

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Satish Jha. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Satish_Jha&diff=380078813&oldid=376665030 Wuh  Wuz  Dat  04:33, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors, as you did here: Talk:Satish Jha. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Satish_Jha&diff=380079375&oldid=380078813 Wuh  Wuz  Dat  04:34, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Dpindia for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Wuh Wuz  Dat  04:41, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

__NOINDEX__ Blurpeace  10:03, 27 August 2010 (UTC)