User talk:MiB-24/Archive1

24 mergers
I want you to know that I am with you on the latest ridiculous ones; this is out of control and someone needs to draw the line. I wanted to get rid of nobodies; soon we will be rid of everybody. asyndeton 17:51, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

It looks like this over for now guys. Head over to my talk page to view an account of what happened, but Theresa, one of the admins, has removed ALL of the merge tags from the remaining major characters. She suggested, however, that we continue to research independent and credible sources to support our stance for keeping the individual pages. But for now, it's settled. Thanks for all of your input. Angelriver 17:07, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Perhaps AnteaterZot is someone's special friend. And what's with all the ruckus over some TV characters anyway? Bloody, self-appointed Wiki police.....Angelriver (talk) 18:00, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Just to let you know, I've deleted Lucy's tags for Mike Novick and Martha Logan. They've been there for at least 3 months, and she failed to garner any support. An admin also just deleted her merger tag for Karen Hayes due to the same reasoning. Angelriver (talk) 06:03, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Where is lucy whining about me? I would like to defend myself.--Lan Di (talk) 20:01, 5 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Argh, found it, anyways, I turned her own argument against her. This should hold her off for now--Lan Di (talk) 20:54, 5 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Now she's claiming I am breaking rules because I brought up POINT, which she says is irrelevant in this case. I thought all rules were always relevant in all cases. I guess when she thinks the rules apply to her view, they work, when they don't, they're irrelevant. She's threatening to get me banned now, and she can't hold an argument of her own. Then she claimed I want every character having their own page, when I countered that I wasn't in total favor of Lynn McGill having his own page.--Lan Di (talk) 03:26, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Cabal
Thanks for the heads up. TunaSushi (talk) 06:00, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Mediation Case on Hold
As a case is currently occurring at the Arbitration Commitee, i have placed the current MedCabal case on hold to prevent conflict occurring between any consensus that occurs at MedCab and any decisions that are made at ArbCom. I recommend you watch the outcomes and discussions that occur at ArbCom as you could be affected by them.

If you do do not want me as a mediator and wish for someone else to mediate after the ArbCom case is over then feel free to place a request on the MedCab talk page and then notify me so that i can see if your points are valid enough for me to recuse myself. I hope that this case will be dealt with soon. Seddon69 (talk) 16:21, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

RFC
If you receive this sometime soon, could you post a message on my talk page? I talked to Lan Di about someone, and I wanted your input as well. I'll explain on my talk page, thanks. Steve Crossin (talk) 06:59, 23 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Just a reminder, drop a message on my talk page when you can. Steve Crossin (talk) 00:55, 24 February 2008 (UTC)