User talk:MiEhrynn

Speedy deletion nomination of CakeMail
Hello MiEhrynn,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged CakeMail for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Barney the barney barney (talk) 12:22, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of CakeMail


The article CakeMail has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Article lacks notability and contains very little content and is written in mostly promotional tone of view.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FockeWulf FW 190 (talk) 18:44, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of CakeMail


The article CakeMail has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * This article reads like an advertisement and a press release and contains little content on the subject of the article. Content also appears to be cherry picked as well.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FockeWulf FW 190 (talk) 17:40, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of CakeMail for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CakeMail is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/CakeMail until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:59, 9 July 2017 (UTC)