User talk:Mia1216/sandbox

Peer review Response

•Is the topic of the article clear? - Yes both topics are very clear •Is it clearly related to class content? - Yes both topics directly relate to the course and black feminist though

•Does the lead paragraph explain the importance of the topic? •Does the lead paragraph cover all aspects presented in subheadings? - Currently, i don’t see you having a lead paragraph. If you were to edit the one on the African-American women’s suffrage movement, you could definitely add a lot. Right now their lead paragraph is only a few sentences. Maybe create a whole section on Black feminism or “The Black Feminist Narrative”. The lead paragraph for Nalo Hopkinson is also very short. I think it would also be beneficial to create an entire section on Black feminism or expand on what affect her novels have had on black feminism and the black female narrative.

•Are the sections organized well, in a sensible order? Would they make more sense presented some other way (chronologically, for example)? - Organization on both articles is currently organized well. •Do the sections make clear how the article is related to class content? - Right now both articles do not clearly relate to the class but the ideas you have do so that would be great.

•Which class texts might the student use and where? - Angela Davis. “Working Women, Black Women, and the History of the Suffrage Movement” - **Nancy Hewitt, “Re-rooting American Women’s Activism: Global Perspectives on 1848” •Can you recommend other scholarly sources or authors the student should consult? - I like your idea of using "A Feminist Reading of Soucouyants in Nalo Hopkinson's "Brown Girl in the Ring" and "Skin Folk""[9] and "Queer Universes Sexualities in Science Fiction"[10]