User talk:MiaKarina

Welcome to wikipedia!
ST47 Talk 20:12, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Edit Summary Request
I have noted that you edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky or even vandalizing. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s). Thanks! -- Kukini 21:39, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Pink Bridge Incident
Not to judge your character, but you should be sticking to editing Wikipedia articles and staying a while before filing AfD's. Your statement that it is not "notable" outside the "local area" is very well unfounded based upon the sources cited, and is irrelevant since there are many pages within Wikipedia that are specific to the article itself.

Should we be going and deleting Recreation in Huntington, West Virginia since it is local? Or what about all the notable people from Huntington that have entries? Veterans Memorial Fieldhouse and Keith Albee would also fit the bill, along with Buildings at the University of Kentucky, etc. You haven't defined a line and it is vague and insignificant at best.  Seicer  (talk) (contribs) 16:03, 20 November 2006 (UTC)


 * It's just that it seems with all new articles that I have been writing, a user would slap up an AfD or a Speedy Delete template based on the fact that it is "incomplete" or "non notable". My frustrations are boiling over, in some sense, because of that, sorry if I just happened to lash out at you. It has been picked up by the AP and is known to many news outlets. I just hope that this hideous bridge doesn't open the door to other color spans, but it seems as if it has already led to that... In that case, I'll lump the other colored spans into Pink bridge Incident. Cheers and happy editing,  Seicer  (talk) (contribs) 16:28, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Nomination of Case study in psychology for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Case study in psychology, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Case study in psychology until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 12 February 2021 (UTC)