User talk:Miacek/Archives/2009/September

Johan Backman - about his complaints against Soviet Story
Sorry, but I had to revert one of your edits to Johan Backman, as this was a bit inaccurate and the source was very dodgy. First, Backman has in no position to start criminal proceedings (it's only for police), he only filed a complaint. His complaint was not against the movie, but against the organizer of the later display events (ProKarelia), so this is not directly related to Helsinki protests. All this is briefly mentioned in Soviet Story. Põhja Konn (talk) 13:34, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, it's all right. I had just read out of curiosity the article on The Soviet Story in the ru.wiki and there was something like возбудить уголовное дело, which I apparently mistranslated, too. -- Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (woof!) 14:18, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

The date is wrong on the DYK tag
It is currently August 2009, and apparently this article appeared on the main page three months into the future from now! Is this date supposed to read 2006? Thanks to anyone who is prepared to do the leg work to check this. Best wishes Invertzoo (talk) 21:02, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes it is. I tried to changet, but it didn't work, even though on the page's source it says "28 Novmeber 2006".-- Rayqayza Dialga Weird 2210   21:11, 13 September 2009 (UTC) Pleas fix this if you know how. The article is Kanab ambersnail -- Rayqayza Dialga Weird 2210    21:16, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Arbitration case regarding the Eastern European mailing list
The Arbitration Committee recently passed a motion to open a case to investigate allegations surrounding a private Eastern European mailing list. The contents of the motion can be viewed here.

You have been named as one of the parties to this case at the request of the Arbitration Committee, here. Please take note of the explanations given in italics at the top of that section; if you have any further questions about the list of parties, please feel free to contact me on my talk page.

The Committee has explicitly requested that evidence be presented within one week of the case opening; ie. by September 25. Evidence can be presented on the evidence subpage of the case; please ensure that you follow the Committee instructions regarding the responsible and appropriate submission of evidence, as set out in the motion linked previously, should you choose to present evidence.

Please further note that, due to the exceptional nature of this case (insofar as it centers on the alleged contents of a private mailing list), the Committee has decided that the normal workshop format will not be used. The notice near the top of the cases' workshop page provides a detailed explanation of how it will be used in this case.

For the Arbitration Committee, Daniel (talk) 06:12, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Please comment here
User:Piotrus/ArbCom. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 19:27, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Minor edits
Hi, no problems - I think it was an accident. I'd been writing quite a bit of stuff this morning..Svejk74 (talk) 12:38, 26 September 2009 (UTC)