User talk:Miacek/Archives/2010/September

Left-wing fascism
I noticed that you recently voted on left-wing fascism to keep and you recommended "re-write and keep". Could you please provide recommendations for how this article could be re-written. TFD (talk) 22:02, 2 September 2010 (UTC)


 * I think I meant scholarly sources back then, the ones that came up in a google books search in fact, I think Martintg referred to those. Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (t) 17:50, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks
I don't mind people vandalizing my userpage, both per point 26 here and the fact that they're not vandalizing pages people actually read during that time. Still, thanks for your vigilance! --Illythr (talk) 09:48, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

3RR warning
I see you have warned 60.240.241.57 of 3RR. You're at risk of blocking for edit warring yourself, too. Bishonen | talk 11:53, 19 September 2010 (UTC).
 * I know, I have already reported the page for semi-protection. Charges of 'fascism' (not supported by any sources in fact) are slanderous in addition to being POV. But I can't revert this due to our policies, that sometimes support lobbyists like the couple of IPs today and yesterday.Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (t) 12:34, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Minor and major edits
Incidentally, Miacek, please don't mark so many of your regular edits as "minor", it's misleading. See Help:Minor edit. If the marking happens automatically, you can go in under "Editing" in "My preferences" and uncheck "Mark all edits minor by default." Bishonen | talk 16:02, 19 September 2010 (UTC).


 * Which edits in fact? I think I mostly had them marked as per guidelines. It's true, I recently ticked the preference of automatically marking all edits as minor (when I decided to be inactive, after a sock puppeteer started a campaign to drive me off the project), and if I decide to keep going with major contributions now I'm sure to change those settings. Regardless of settings, I try to use correct edit summaries etc. Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (t) 17:03, 19 September 2010 (UTC)


 * A few examples of edits mistakenly marked minor recently:     Compare When to mark/not to mark an edit as a minor edit. Note that you only mark removal of very obvious vandalism as minor; it's not something to use against any kind of possibly good-faith edit, however misguided you may consider it. I hope you don't have any further trouble with the other user! Regards, Bishonen | talk 03:00, 20 September 2010 (UTC).
 * Hi Bish, agreed on edits to Talk:SD. Edits made by Twinkle were automatically marked as minor, perhaps because I had chosen the option in preferences (Twinkle doesn't ask you for ticking edits as major/minor). As for my edit at Martin's talk page, it was probably an accident but don't worry, we're on friendly terms with Martin so I can't see this as an issue. Miacek and his crime-fighting dog  (t) 10:40, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Note here and there
radek (talk) 03:50, 20 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Huh, if that was someone impersonating you then that's pretty messed up.radek (talk) 07:49, 20 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi Radek, you are smart enough to understand that it was an impersonator. And it was not 'someone', but the one who was terrorizing me in August (remember your attempts to assign him the role of a victim?). And you know me quite well since the EEML time, when I would speak out in this list against the 'active measures' some of the members considered using. I hope you have understood your mistake by now, when in August 2010 you - being (temporarily I hope?) skewed against me supported that troll/POV pusher/sock puppeteer, basically derailing the discussion. I don't know if all of this is a work of a madman or someone I happened to do terrible injustice in some previous life, but I'm pretty sure you're not that naive as to really believe that I need sock puppets myself for coping with that crackpot. I'm quite busy right now, so I wouldn't comment on your case right now, but indeed, I am concerned. Supporting vandalism directed against a particular user based on a few disagreements is really something we should avoid. Taking advantage of obvious impersonators or vandals to further one's line against a particular established user is unacceptable. I'm sure you understood my point. Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (t) 10:35, 20 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Miacek, what this person did or try to do is inexcusable. Frankly I've never seen anything like that on Wikipedia before (and I've seen a lot) so when I saw those edits, while it was obvious something fishy was going on, I did think it was really you - particularly given the edit summaries. I didn't think you were sockpuppeting since the name was too close. I just thought there might be some unknown reason for it. In any case, it wasn't you, I was mistaken, my apologies. Hope they ban him with prejudice.


 * I do however resent the accusations (and implicit threats) you're making against me. Please just take it as an honest mistake.And your statement that during the EEML time you "would speak out in this list against the 'active measures' some of the members considered using" doesn't quite jive with my recollections or the archive. In fact you might want to be careful here before someone goes back and rereads those messages of yours. Frankly, I didn't pay much attention to most of your post during list time, but having read some of them again if I had I would have probably left the list in mid to late July.radek (talk) 20:41, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

SPI
Hi there. From now on, when reporting socks of, including IPs please simply create a new case/section at Sockpuppet investigations/Dodo19. Let me know if you have any questions. Cheers, Tiptoety  talk 19:38, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Please use the SPI report template when making a report, thanks. T. Canens (talk) 08:33, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Request
Revert vandal ? Biophys (talk) 22:04, 27 September 2010 (UTC)


 * As the IP left no edit summary, my crime-fighting dog would likely take this for vandalism indeed. Is there a reason you can't edit that page (I never had it in my watchlist)? Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (t) 09:49, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks. The removed text may be interpreted as SU-related, so I can not edit it.Biophys (talk) 15:16, 28 September 2010 (UTC)