User talk:Miacek/Archives/2011/February

ANI
I´ve reported Scythian77 again:. Thank you. Uirauna (talk) 15:37, 24 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (woof!) 11:48, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Autopatrolled
Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:
 * This permission does not give you any special status or authority
 * Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
 * You may wish to display the Autopatrolled top icon and/or the User wikipedia/autopatrolled userbox on your user page
 * If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it
 * If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 21:41, 24 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks. Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (woof!) 11:48, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

English Defence League Changes
This article was changed to state that this group type is anti-islamism and its first paragraph states it is a far right group.

This can only be wrong. Its common knowledge that the EDL is anti Islamic extremism as stated on a recent BBC Newsnight edition by its own leader.

The EDL is not anti Islamism as they are happy to stand shoulder to shoulder with other ethnic groups against the extremist muslims. The far right refers to a group of people who believe they are superior. This is not the case, and this explanation is defined by your own wikipedia article under the heading 'far right'.

It is only correct to say that the EDL is anti Islamic extremism and its an important difference to make.

I am asking to remove the far right reference and to have the EDL listed as anti islamic extremism.

Just like the UAF fight against Nazi groups is considered anti extremism, thats what the EDL is fighting too, unless you are suggesting that just because the group is against extremism from another ethnic group somehow makes that in itself..extremist. GoldstoneNS87 (talk) 11:07, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by GoldstoneNS87 (talk • contribs) 10:59, 3 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Take a look here WP:NPOV (our guidelines for neutral point of view), WP:V (on how to source and attribute claims) and WP:OR (avoiding advocacy and personal interpretation). That's simply the way Wikipedia works. Our own sentiments are simply not enough, otherwise we would get a permanent battleground of EDL supporters and opponents, pro-communists and anticommunists etc. MIaceK (woof!) 11:31, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Thanks !
Thanks for spotting that Ritter might not be the good source, I realised that we were actually using a translation of work published first under Nazi Germany. Well, I guess mistakes do happen. I will replace Ritter where I can with more modern sources. Have a good day.--MyMoloboaccount 14:11, 8 February 2011 (UTC)


 * I don't think it was a mistake when the Berkley university press published a translation of this renowned work by a German historian. --Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (woof!) 14:51, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes he is a historical figure that had influence on German nationalism. Also from article on him:Ritter was a staunch German nationalist who belonged to a political movement generally known to historians as National conservatism.[28] Ritter identified with the idea of an authoritarian government in Germany that would make his country Europe's foremost power.[29]--MyMoloboaccount (talk) 15:07, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Cleanup of Meltyukhov's note
I am not sure what needs to be cleaned up... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 00:34, 14 February 2011 (UTC)


 * See talk. Some stuff might be cleaned-up (e.g. 'Kruzsenie'), some even removed. Let's discuss this at the resp. talk page. Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (woof!) 12:29, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Gdansk
Why you change the article the way is not historical now. You can chack it on polish wikipedia, and Im sure that the polish one is closer to the true then it is in your version.

Gdańsk in english is Gdansk not Danzig.

Germanic tribes were not the first ones whe settled in Gdańsk so get back the version I created. KarliSopo


 * Please check the resp. talk page there, too. It's not Polish or German Wikipedia here, but a more universal edition. As a newby, you shouldn't begin with controversial changes that endanger the balance we've reached. PS. New talk page threads go below other posts. Thanks in advance. Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (woof!) 11:29, 18 February 2011 (UTC)