User talk:Miacek/Archives/2013/January

re Nagorno Karabakh
I mass-reverted someone who added the same screed to multiple pages. It had no purpose being on the others, he doesn't get to play shotgun and hope it sticks. It also contained at least one factual error. I see no reason to coddle this user. --Golbez (talk) 15:29, 2 January 2013 (UTC)


 * I see no reason not to fix the alleged error and revert the whole thing. It was a sourced para.--Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (woof!) 15:56, 2 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Being sourced does not make it relevant for the article. Was it relevant in the other half dozen places the exact same thing was pasted? No. But since you've insisted, I'll elaborate: 1) It introduces Khojaly as if this were the article on it, when it's handled further down in the existing prose. 2) It says it was in the NKAO. 3) It says this happened in 2012 (I know they mean 1992 but still). 4) It gives the details of the massacre when before it was part of the narrative of the war, as if the massacre was separate from it. 5) It then gives the existing text as "Background of the genocide"; really? Not expressing a certain POV here, are we? 6) So far as I can tell, despite supplying a dozen references for a single paragraph, not one is in the English language. Why is that? 7) It repeats information given lower in the article specifically because the editor didn't care what was in the article, because he pasted this same exact paragraph to a half dozen articles. 8) It simply was unnecessary, hyperbolic, and added nothing to the articles it was placed in. That's eight reasons. --Golbez (talk) 16:48, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Social Democratic Party
I know centre-left isn't an idelogy, so that's why I removed it afterwards. By the way, learn some manners. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Netsurfer123 (talk • contribs) 16:49, 8 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Stop making the same meaningless edits again and again. Not sure why 'centrism' was removed too, given the abundance of sourced in intro.Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (woof!) 16:51, 8 January 2013 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry, I didn't mean to cause such a mess. I was only trying to clear it up. Well hopefully I can continue making contributions elsewhere without being moaned at. I understand that my edits were meaningless, but initially I thought they were beneficial. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Netsurfer123 (talk • contribs) 16:56, 8 January 2013 (UTC)


 * OK, just be more careful in the future and do not edit war.--Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (woof!) 16:59, 8 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Yeah sorry about the edit war. I wasn't actually aware of it because I wasn't sure whether I had changed the link back or whether someone else had, but what the heck, it's fixed now :) Yeah, I'll be more careful in the future :)

The Communist Party of Greece
The Communist Party of Greece has too an Eurocommunist ideology --Danrolo 23:21, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Danrolo/IP 190...
Hello Estlandia,

User:Danrolo has been blocked for 72 h. However, he often edits with changing IPs. The administrator, User:Bbb23 asks us to inform him if Danrolo returns with a new IP. Kind regards. --RJFF (talk) 19:49, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Vandalism
I see you are stalking my edits, thank you. Reverting addition of a porn star to a serious article is fighting a vandalism. If you have a problem with that, go ahead and report me. - Darwinek (talk) 19:49, 24 January 2013 (UTC)


 * First, this addition was NOT simple vandalism and I will report you if you do it again. Second, I'm not stalking anyone, i have the article in my watchlist since I first edited it in 2010. . --Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (woof!) 20:31, 24 January 2013 (UTC)


 * It was a simple vandalism, and you can report me even now if you think otherwise. Cheers. - Darwinek (talk) 21:54, 24 January 2013 (UTC)