User talk:Miacek/Archives/2013/March

Edit warring at Erika Steinbach
Volunteer Marek 19:48, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Karabakh War
Here is the link, http://www.eurasianet.org/node/66664, i probably set it up incorrectly. Ninetoyadome (talk) 23:28, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Baltic blowups
My apologies Estlandia. It's just frustrating when you've got editors supporting revisionism. GoodDay (talk) 13:56, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
 * No revisionism here, just some editors suffering from amnesia. --Nug (talk) 19:56, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
 * BTW Estlandia, say hello to my stalker. PS: Atleast he agrees that he's suffering from amnesia. -- GoodDay (talk) 20:41, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I know Nug since 2008, no surprise that he has my talk page in his watchlist.Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (woof!) 20:57, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Nug already beat you to it (ie. linking to my Czech revert) & like I explained to him, I let the undoing of that revert stand. GoodDay (talk) 14:52, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Received Your mail
Hello ! I received Your e-mail, but something in my Outlook Express stops me from making a reply. So I reply to You here instead. And a large Thanks, by the way. However I've got no knowledge of the subject You wanted me to have a look at though. (But I've been interested in the "in between the wars-period" for a long time. WWI and II aswell.) In general I agree that some Polish users seems aggresive towards non-Polish users, and they sometimes deliberate or not (?), uses dubios and/or biosed sources. And quite a few Polish-related articles are sadly affected by "tipping" in a certain direction, disreguarding all NPOV Wikipedian rules. Or by removal of some parts and adding others - often with no obvious reason. (Example the city of Wroclaw/Breslau was in the middle of the 13:th century destroyed by the Mongols, three of each other indepening, Swedish encyklopedias states, but was removed without reason, even though thecity was not under Kingdom of Poland during this event. I'm just sad for the readers, and the credibility of English Wikipedia in the long run) I do though hope that Marek is about to improve himself as editor. He actually is reasonable, but very suspicious towards non-Polish editors, I guess. But on the other hand, circumstances like an anonymous user (after starting his argumentation rather well) accuses Polish people of being car thiefs is not helpful eighter. Cheers Boeing720 (talk) 22:56, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Lol. Wheren't you just complaining about supposed (as opposed to apparantly, real) canvassing? Volunteer Marek 01:28, 12 March 2013 (UTC)


 * 1.User Estlandia wanted me to take a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Democracy&diff=543134565&oldid=543078941, and like I here stated, I'm not up to date with this issue at all. But there was no harm in mailing me this.

2.In general (to all users) I would just like to point out that in writing, in my own experience atleast, small matters suddenly may very fast blow up to troublesome argumentation. Please concider that Wikipedia is ment to be an encyklopedia for readers. No need for hard words. Boeing720 (talk) 23:48, 12 March 2013 (UTC)