User talk:Miachelshanaguatl

Welcome!
Hello, Miachelshanaguatl, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Fancyfurever, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! T F { Contribs } 12:37, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Fancyfurever


A tag has been placed on Fancyfurever, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. T F { Contribs } 12:37, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fancyfurever


The article Fancyfurever has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * I see no indication that this is notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:50, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Fancyfurever for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fancyfurever is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Fancyfurever until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:12, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Fancyfurever
In your request to speedy delete this article (which I have declined - please see the deletion discussion), you used the edit summary "Please delete page. We will check issues and repost" (my emphasis). Can you please tell me who "We" is, as Wikipedia does not allow an account to be used by an organization or a group, but only by an individual person. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:14, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
 * You should not reinstate a declined speedy deletion request, but I think the easiest thing to do is just deleted it, so I have done that. But do be aware that if you recreate the article while the book still does not satisfy Wikipedia's notability requirements (at WP:NBOOK and WP:GNG) then it will be referred for deletion discussion again. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:06, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

December 2015
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours because you have made it clear that this account is being used by multiple people, and for the purposes of commercial promotion - if you cannot convince me otherwise within 24 hours, and also commit to only one person using it, I will extend the block to indefinite. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:58, 5 December 2015 (UTC) Just to note that the evidence for a group promotional account is in an edit summary in the now-deleted article, which read "In the article, this project is done by a group (writer, editor, illustrator, etc)", which came after my request above to clarify who is the "we" apparently working on this article. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:12, 5 December 2015 (UTC)