User talk:Miamiguy100

Recent edit to Honolulu
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Honolulu, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! -War wizard90 (talk) 01:46, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Honolulu has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Honolulu was changed by Honoluluguy100 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.871155 on 2015-03-07T18:35:06+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:35, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

How do i change my username? I hate it.Honoluluguy100 (talk) 19:08, 8 March 2015 (UTC)


 * You can request a username change at WP:Changing username/Simple. Please make sure that the new name is available; you can use Special:ListUsers to check the list of registered users. Huon (talk) 19:20, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Why is it important to source info and discourage original research (why is verifiability so important)? For example, my edits to Miami have been reverted because it was regarded as original research. And the info was true: Miami is the second largest city in FL and the enormous amounts of coconut trees is an indication of the warm tropical climate of the city. Everyone knows that. Miamiguy100 (talk) 21:08, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
 * WP:Verifiability and WP:No original research are absolutely fundamental polices (together with WP:Neutral point of view), and without them Wikipedia would be something quite different and less useful. The point of WP:V is that a reader should not have to rely on Wikipedia, but should be able to check where the information comes from. That's why a published source is required. The point of WP:NOR is that an encyclopedia is not a place for new ideas, or people's own opinions, only for summarising already published material. Without them, Wikipedia would become something between a discussion forum and a blog. There are plenty of those about, but we are trying to do something different. JohnCD (talk) 22:12, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Miami
Regarding this edit and your edit summary, what you are talking about sounds something like Simple Wikipedia. -- Racer X11 Talk to me Stalk me  19:22, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Miami has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:12, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Miami was changed by Miamiguy100 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.93899 on 2015-04-19T19:12:50+00:00.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Miami, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. —S MALL JIM   19:21, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Honolulu, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Honolulu was changed by Miamiguy100 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.931512 on 2015-04-19T19:27:57+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:28, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Miami. Racer X11 Talk to me Stalk me  19:53, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates, as you did to User talk:Racerx11. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. Amaury (talk) 21:07, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. —S MALL JIM   21:09, 19 April 2015 (UTC)


 * You're not really helping your case. If you want to be unblocked, you need to address the concerns that got you blocked in the first place, agree to cease your edit war, and instead discuss the edits you want to make on the articles' talk pages to reach a consensus. - Amaury (talk) 21:44, 19 April 2015 (UTC)