User talk:Micah Fitch

Well, it disagreed with the rest of the article rather sharply. I meant to save it to the talk page, but my connection died. I understand your point about the philosiphy of science, but it doesn't quite fit with the facts. A citation backing your position up would help--Tznkai 29 June 2005 00:39 (UTC) Posted your edit to talk for discussion.--Tznkai 29 June 2005 14:57 (UTC)

OK, I just thought that the rest of the article was sharply biased and generalizing. I am not a literalist creationist nor and intelligent designist, but I still can see very obvious differences in their standpoints and to lump them into one category is insensitive of the philosophical differences between the views. It's all good thought!