User talk:Mich1980lan

Yes! Weekly
Hi, I've seen your edits to the Yes! Weekly article. I have reverted them for now but would like to encourage you to improve the article in other ways. Your first efforts included some new information, but it was uncited. When adding new facts that may be disputed (like circulation numbers) it is best to cite those numbers (I or other more experienced users can help you with the formatting on this). Second, when adding new text it is helpful to add links to other wikipedia articles (this is the backbone of Wikipedia and your previous edit deleted text with numerous links and replaced it with text with no links link by putting words in double brackets). On a similar note, removing facts from the article should be avoided unless you believe they are incorrect, outdated, or inappropriate to the topic (your last edit removed several facts). If you do remove facts, it is helpful to note in your edit summary that it why or noting it on the talk page (talk page link is at the top of the page, the button saying "Discussion"). Finally, Wikipedia articles must be written with an encyclopedic tone. Phrases like "our main telephone number is XXX-XXX-XXXX" read more like advertising than an encyclopedia.

Please feel free to contact me if you have questions or concerns. The last thing I want to do is discourage you from improving the article (or other articles) as it is currently short and not particularly informative. However, we've got to stick to the guidelines the help make Wikipedia work and I hope my suggestions have been helpful and clear. If not, as I said I would be more than happy to help out with anything. -- Jieagles (talk) 01:02, 12 June 2010 (UTC)