User talk:Michaël

List of purported cults
I would appreciate your views on why the French report is not a suitable source as per Wikipedia content-policies. Thanks. &asymp; jossi &asymp; t &bull; @ 19:08, 9 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia requires reputable sources, see verifiability. From the section "Questions regarding the (FR) source" of the talk page it is clear that this source is not reputable. In one documented case, the responsible person of the french government had to publicly withdraw his conjectures (of, in this case, anthroposophy being a "secte"). Sources for this will take a while (I would have to contact the one who found this report in a french newspaper). -- Michael 19:42, 9 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The New York Times makes errors too. Please add the information you find to talk:List of purported cults. -Will Beback 22:26, 9 February 2006 (UTC)


 * I have found the ref you were looking for. I have posted it at talk:List of purported cults. &asymp; jossi &asymp; t &bull; @ 22:58, 9 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks. Michael 11:28, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

List of purported cults has been deleted and replaced by Governmental lists of cults and sects -- Michael (talk) 18:34, 15 March 2014 (UTC)