User talk:Michael.W.Meissner

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! -- Whpq (talk) 18:02, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Image copyright problem with Image:Michael Meissner.JPG
Thank you for uploading Image:Michael Meissner.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:59, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:Scan0033.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:SCAN0033.JPG. The copy called Image:SCAN0033.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 16:44, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Descramble
A tag has been placed on Descramble requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Greenguy1090 (talk) 23:25, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi Greenguy, Thanks for your input to Descramble. I am struggling with this one, should I create a stub or should I suggest that this article be added to Scrambler or should I put it into the article on Cable Converter Box which is where I referenced it, since it is the act of Scrambling in reverse? As I tried to define, a Descrambler is a piece of equipment found in Telecommunications network that decrypts or descrambles a encryped or scrambled signal allowing it to be viewed, heard, read etc. Your suggestions or help would be most appreciated.

Should I add the holdon tag until this is completed?

Thanks, Michael William Meissner (talk) 14:30, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Adding references
Hi. I saw your note on the talk page of cable converter box article asking how to properly add references. Adding them can be a bit confusing, so please don't hesitate to ask me for additional help. I'd be glad to give you a hand. I have your talk page on my watchlist so please reply here, and I will answer here as well.

WP:REF outlines information about referencing. But I found it confusing when I first started using it. I suggest after reading it, you also look at WP:CIT which provides you with templates that you can fill in that will generate citations for you.

To insert a references, start with a reference tag.

To generate the reference list, add a section for references if it doesn't already exist by adding a section header and then the text.

I hope this helps. And once again, please do not hesitate to ask. I would be glad to assist. Regards. -- Whpq (talk) 18:02, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. -- Whpq (talk) 18:02, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

RMAG
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of RMAG, and it appears to be a substantial copy of. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:28, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi and thanks for your comment. I started to create this article and only after I created it did I realize that there was already and article on Rocky Mountain Association of Geologist which is what the acronym stands for. This word should really just redirect to the Rocky Mountain Association of Geologist. Do I use a redirect to accomplish this or is there a "Wikipedia" way to add other words that are similar such as acronymns other spellings etc., to an existing article? To the end that when someone searches RMAG they would come up with Rocky Mtn. Association of Geologist. Or perhaps if someone was to search a Name of someone but the article didn't list the middle name for example but most reference material uses the middle initial. How is this best handled in Wikipedia terms. Your comments and suggestions of course are welcome and appreciated. Thanks,Michael William Meissner (talk) 14:37, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of RMAG
A tag has been placed on RMAG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gromlakh (talk) 04:28, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi and thanks for your comment. I started to create this article and only after I created it did I realize that there was already and article on Rocky Mountain Association of Geologist which is what the acronym stands for. This word should really just redirect to the Rocky Mountain Association of Geologist. Do I use a redirect to accomplish this or is there a "Wikipedia" way to add other words that are similar such as acronymns other spellings etc., to an existing article? To the end that when someone searches RMAG they would come up with Rocky Mtn. Association of Geologist. Or perhaps if someone was to search a Name of someone but the article didn't list the middle name for example but most reference material uses the middle initial. How is this best handled in Wikipedia terms. Your comments and suggestions of course are welcome and appreciated. Thanks,

Image copyright problem with Image:RMAG Logo.gif
Thank you for uploading Image:RMAG Logo.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:49, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Additional Questions about Cites and References
I still don't understand how you put one of those blue superscripted numbers in the body of the article that refers to a reference listed in the reference section below. Can you give me an example?

Michael William Meissner (talk) 14:55, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Sure. I struggled with references when I first tried, so answers from me are from hard-won editting screw-ups.  Have a look at Larry Surock.  Every sentence in the article has been referenced.  The key thing to remember is that the tag is used to identify the reference.  And the  template is used to generate the list of references at the bottom of the article. -- Whpq (talk) 15:16, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

This is much clearer now! Thank you so much. I will seek to add these to my article submission to improve their quality, readability, and accuracy. Thank you very muchMichael William Meissner (talk) 04:02, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Common Language
Another editor has added the "prod" template to the article Common Language, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 08:29, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi, Thanks for your comment. I believe Common Language is a notable subject because it is a defacto standard in the Teleocommunications industry, CLLI (Common Language Location Identifiers) and (CELI) Common Language Equipment Identifiers, two parts of the Common Language "product" are used by almost every Telecom Service provider and every manufacturer of network equipment on the planet. Further Common Language is the follout of countless ANSI, ITU, and IEEE standards. Further it is the implementation ot the Telemenagement Forums SID (Shared Information/Data) standard. I do recognize that Common Language is in fact a product as is Kleenex and many others. So can you give me advise on how to make this article of significant notibality and quality to satisfy the Wikipedia standards and not get deleted? These other topics; CLLI and CELI are also subject that are notable and I desire to eventually create articles for. But again because they are products I need to correctly create these articles. Should they be a part of the Common Language Article or stand alones. If they are a part of the Common Language Article, how do I redirect a search on CLLI for example to the correct section of the Common Language article? Can you give me an example. Thanks again for your comments? Michael William Meissner (talk) 15:03, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Caution re conflict of interest
You appear to have a close connection to a subject you have written about that raises concerns about a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. Anyone with a conflict of interest must avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing articles related to you, your family or colleagues, your organization or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam);
 * and you must always:
 * 1) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Conflict of Interest. Raymond Arritt (talk) 18:43, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi Raymond, as I am new to creating Wikipedia aricles of course I am very interested in maintaining unbiased an quality articles as well as becoming better at this. Thus your comments are most appreciated. Would you please advise me where I might have done so or why your perspective is thus, so as to make sure I am clear and my contributions are both of value and quality. ThanksMichael William Meissner (talk) 03:58, 20 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Michael, many of your edits involve Fred Meissner and organizations or activities related to him. I assume from your common surnames that you are related in some way. You're welcome to edit on those topics, but just be careful to maintain a neutral, encyclopedic tone. In particular I noticed that Fred Meissner includes subjective language like "world renowned" and so forth, which Wikipedia discourages (see WP:PEACOCK). More to the point, such language inadvertently arouse skepticism by sounding overly promotional. Fred Meissner's accomplishments are impressive enough that you don't need to convince the reader that he was a prominent and respected figure; the objective facts do that much more effectively than laudatory adjectives. Let me know if you have any questions. Raymond Arritt (talk) 04:22, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi, I see that Raymond Arritt has already addressed this issue, so I will merely say that I share his concerns. I immediately looked in the edit history of Petroleum geology when I spotted the entry you added to the "See also" section that begins: "Fred Meissner, World Renowned Petroleum Geologist". That stands out like a sore thumb. I'm sure it's sincere on your part, but it's totally out-of-place on Wikipedia. Anyway, 'nuff said -- like R. Arritt said, just let the facts speak for themselves. Regards, Cgingold (talk) 12:47, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Common Language, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. As a copyright violation, Common Language appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Common Language has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Common Language and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Common Language with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Common Language.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Whpq (talk) 14:42, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your comments. I will seek to rectify this matter immediately....Michael William Meissner (talk) 15:06, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Moving pages
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently copied the contents of a page and pasted it into another with a different name. This is what we call a "cut and paste move", and it is very undesirable because it splits the article's history, which is needed for attribution and is helpful in many other ways. The mechanism we use for renaming articles is to move it to a new name which both preserves the page's history and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. In most cases, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. If there is an article that you cannot move yourself by this process, follow the instructions at Requested moves to request the move by another. Also, if there are any other articles that you copied and pasted, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Russ (talk) 13:07, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Petroleum Technology Transfer Council


A tag has been placed on Petroleum Technology Transfer Council, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here.  DGG ( talk ) 02:25, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Fred Meissner for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fred Meissner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Fred Meissner until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:28, 8 January 2018 (UTC)